Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorTakehiko Nagakura.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSoto Ogueta, Carolina Men_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-14T18:40:37Z
dc.date.available2012-09-14T18:40:37Z
dc.date.copyright2012en_US
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/72975
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M. in Architecture Studies)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 2012.en_US
dc.descriptionThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from student submitted PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 144-147).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe use of Building Information Modeling (BIM) tools is increasing across the Architectural, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry. This technology is being adopted in many different countries, in a wide range of types of projects, and by professionals from different disciplines. In other words, BIM tools are being applied in many different contexts of use. Consequently, the requirements of its users are becoming heterogeneous and this heterogeneity hinders the development of BIM tools that can satisfy all possible user requirements. Instead, tools are developed to satisfy more broad, general, and generic needs of the AEC industry. The present thesis examines how BIM users are adapting the standard tools to satisfy their specific requirements. Utilizing the user innovation theory as the framework of analysis, the thesis examines whether and how BIM users are adapting the tools to respond to their requirements through user innovation. Studying eight specific BIM user innovation cases, from different contexts of use, the thesis presents and analyzes the processes underlying BIM user innovation, from the starting motivation, to the final distribution of the actual innovation. This analysis has two main objectives: first, to recognize whether there is user innovation in the case of BIM tools; and second, to understand how that innovation is developed. Finally, the thesis extracts patterns of innovation, and examines whether these user innovation cases fit the model described by the user innovation theory.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Carolina M. Soto Ogueta.en_US
dc.format.extent148, [1] p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectArchitecture.en_US
dc.titleUser innovation in digital design and construction : dialectical relations between standard BIM tools and specific user requirementsen_US
dc.title.alternativeDialectical relations between standard BIM tools and specific requirementsen_US
dc.title.alternativeDialectical relations between standard BIM tools and specific user requirementsen_US
dc.title.alternativeDialectical relations between standard Building Information Modeling tools and specific user requirementsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.in Architecture Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture
dc.identifier.oclc808355734en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record