Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWaclaw Zalewski.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Craig, M.S. Massachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-27T15:15:48Z
dc.date.available2012-09-27T15:15:48Z
dc.date.copyright1984en_US
dc.date.issued1984en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/73257
dc.descriptionThesis (M.S.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 1984.en_US
dc.descriptionMICROFICHE COPY AVAILABLE IN ARCHIVES AND ROTCH.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 81-83).en_US
dc.description.abstractOn-site construction costs are very significant to project costs, as a result, the present trend is to fabricate larger components to simplify erection. This approach is however limited by the capacity of the transportation network and by constraints placed on erection . In stead of fabricating ever larger components it is possible to develop better adapted and more versatile construct ion machines, or to fully integrate the building components to the erecting mechanisms. The latter approach which finds its extreme expression in self-erecting structures forms the subject of this investigation. The objective is to present a framework of concepts and alternatives by which the potential of this approach can be more fully realized and better understood. The conceptual framework for this investigation was taken from "Kinematic Geometry" a branch of Dynamics generally associated with machine design. We draw from it only its most elemental concepts, these provide the looking glass, the interpretation. The main body consists of three parts. The first two follow the order of construction: first a mechanism is built, and then, by adding constraints, a structure consolidates, while the third discusses different relations and degrees of collaboration between the builder and that which is being built. We believe that, from the perspective here presented, not only is it possible to reformulate many of the problems of construction, but also , as a consequence, the approach to design, allowing for the synthesis of new solutions.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Craig Davis.en_US
dc.format.extent83 leavesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectArchitecture.en_US
dc.titleA kinematic interpretation of the construction processen_US
dc.title.alternativeConstruction process, A kinematic interpretation ofen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.S.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture
dc.identifier.oclc12004256en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record