Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorEdward Robbins.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDackiw, Vladimir Nicholasen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-27T15:16:36Z
dc.date.available2012-09-27T15:16:36Z
dc.date.copyright1985en_US
dc.date.issued1985en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/73265
dc.descriptionThesis (M.S.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 1985.en_US
dc.descriptionMICROFICHE COPY AVAILABLE IN ARCHIVES AND ROTCH.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 162-166).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe public role of effectively guiding, evaluating and prescribing the physical places, patterns and forms we produce and live in according to commonly held external socio-political ideals has been extremely constrained by our limited knowledge of the significance and consequences of the physical environments we produce and live in, and by incomplete social and planning theories that isolate intentions from actions, processes from ideals, individuals from institutions, and space from society . Central to all of these limits of knowledge and fragments of theory is an inadequately developed theory of human act, acting, and action in space and time. We are unable to identify the significant patterns of human activity , in their forms and consequences, and we are unable to do so in an easily understandable way. Action is confused with acts and acting. For there to be an effective, significant and qualitative public debate we must first extend our knowledge of the significance and consequences of the environments we produce and live in, to include a theory of human action in these environments. Only after this theory has been developed can we effectively debate the forms that we produce according to commonly held socio-political ideals. Justice can exist in environments, and environments do contribute to justice. They can and do if we understand environments as structures of human action in time and space, and if we understand justice as a complex ideal consisting of aspects of equality, liberty, opportunity, participation, and difference.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Vladimir Nicholas Dackiw.en_US
dc.format.extent[1], 166 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectArchitecture.en_US
dc.titleJust spaces, just places : towards a theory of justice for human action in time and spaceen_US
dc.title.alternativeTowards a theory of justice for human action in time and spaceen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.S.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture
dc.identifier.oclc13150107en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record