Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorFrank S. Levy.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMcKay, Shannon Ashleyen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.coverage.spatialn-us-vaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-10T15:46:39Z
dc.date.available2012-10-10T15:46:39Z
dc.date.copyright2012en_US
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/73801
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2012.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 311-327).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe linkage between the political dynamics at the state level and actual implementation of land use regulations at the local level is the focus of this dissertation. This focus is explored through the genesis and efficacy of cash proffers, a land use regulatory tool in Virginia. Using a mixed methods approach, I answer research questions on how and why cash proffers came into existence; are implemented; and affect housing development. The importance of this dissertation topic stems from the uniqueness of the case. Virginia is the only state in the United States using cash proffers on such a large-scale as a growth management tool. It is important to understand whether this tool has applicability beyond Virginia. Further, the "politics of land use" are complicated with important consequences for society. We need to understand the role of state level interest groups in the efficacy of local land use regulations, as well as, how the dynamics underlying these regulations at the local level feedback into the statewide debate on growth management and land use. Finally, the costs of servicing new development with public infrastructure have rapidly increased over time. Localities are in search of new revenue sources to cover these infrastructure costs. This dissertation addresses whether cash proffers can be considered as one such source. Through historical analysis of archival materials as well as interviews, I find that cash proffers were an unintended practice resulting from the implementation of state-approved conditional zoning at the local level political process. Data collected through a self-conducted statewide survey of Virginia counties plus state mandated revenue reports shows counties trying to add more certainty to their implementation of cash proffers in the face of the tool's high revenue variability. Multivariate regression results for a short panel of counties suggest that a county's cash proffer activity is negatively associated with new housing construction.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Shannon Ashley McKay.en_US
dc.format.extent353 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectUrban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.titleLand use politics southern style : the case of cash proffers in Virginiaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
dc.identifier.oclc811140135en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record