Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLawrence Susskind.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKay, Jenna (Jenna Leidy)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.coverage.spatialn-us-az n-us-nmen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-10T15:48:18Z
dc.date.available2012-10-10T15:48:18Z
dc.date.copyright2012en_US
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/73817
dc.descriptionThesis (M.C.P.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2012.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 77-82).en_US
dc.description.abstractCollaborative adaptive management (CAM) is a natural resource management approach in which a diverse group of stakeholders iteratively plan, implement, monitor, evaluate and adjust management actions to reduce uncertainty and improve decisions over time. In practice, few examples of successful CAM have been identified. This study examines three efforts in the southwestern United States: the Las Cienegas Adaptive Management Program and two projects in the Malpai Borderlands - Prescribed Fire Planning in the Peloncillo Mountains and the McKinney Flats Project. Three questions are addressed: 1) What does CAM look like in practice'? 2) Are my cases actually examples of CAM? Why or why not'? 3) If so, what enables CAM to happen in these efforts? To be successful, CAM structures need to be able to withstand the length of time and dynamic nature of a CAM process. The three cases each demonstrate effective ways to design and implement many aspects of CAM, but, processes have faltered when key elements were absent. Specific tools, such as the use of a trained mediator and joint fact-finding, were introduced in the cases to address process deficiencies interfering with the group's ability to collaborate or test management strategies. Factors such as effective long-term leadership, committed and enthusiastic participants, and strong organizational partnerships have also promoted the implementation of these programs. Recommendations for implementing a durable, flexible and wise CAM process are included.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Jenna Kay.en_US
dc.format.extent101 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectUrban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.titleCollaborative adaptive management in practice : case studies from Arizona and New Mexicoen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.C.P.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
dc.identifier.oclc811338307en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record