In Situ Permeability Estimation: A Comparison Between Acoustic And NMR Logs

dc.contributor.author	Chen, Wei
dc.contributor.author	Burns, Daniel R.
dc.contributor.author	Tang, Xiao-ming
dc.contributor.other	Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Earth Resources Laboratory	en_US
dc.date.accessioned	2012-12-12T18:06:34Z
dc.date.available	2012-12-12T18:06:34Z
dc.date.issued	1999
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/75417
dc.description.abstract	Permeability estimates from acoustic logs (Stoneley waves) and NMR logs were compared using data from a geologic section consisting of sandstone and shale beds. The permeability results show very good correlation for these two different methods. Data from a gas-bearing zone shows high permeability values from acoustic data and low values from NMR. The difference between these two permeability results can be used as a gas zone indicator.	en_US
dc.description.sponsorship	Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Borehole Acoustics and Logging Consortium	en_US
dc.description.sponsorship	Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Earth Resources Laboratory. Reservoir Delineation Consortium	en_US
dc.publisher	Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Earth Resources Laboratory	en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Earth Resources Laboratory Industry Consortia Annual Report;1999-04
dc.title	In Situ Permeability Estimation: A Comparison Between Acoustic And NMR Logs	en_US
dc.type	Technical Report	en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthor	Chen, Wei
dc.contributor.mitauthor	Burns, Daniel R.
dspace.orderedauthors	Chen, Wei; Burns, Daniel R.; Tang, Xiao-ming	en_US