Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWilliam L. Porter.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMacy, Christineen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture.en_US
dc.coverage.spatialn-us-caen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-07T21:08:48Z
dc.date.available2013-01-07T21:08:48Z
dc.date.copyright1985en_US
dc.date.issued1985en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/75956
dc.descriptionThesis (M. Arch.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 1985.en_US
dc.descriptionMICROFICHE COPY AVAILABLE IN ARCHIVES AND ROTCH.en_US
dc.descriptionSupervised by William L. Porter.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 157-158).en_US
dc.description.abstractI believe that we become human only through contact with one another, and I am interested in our architectural expression and accommodation of our life in communities specifically communities larger than the family and smaller than the city. I have chosen to look at two Catholic parishes as they are examples of community with a long history and a will to exist as a community for its own sake. This thesis investigates two drastically different Californian parishes, using interviews of the pastors, priests and nuns (the "leadership"), and analyzes , historically and architecturally, each parish. This investigation attempts to unveil the architectural language for community spaces implicit in these communities' created space and their perceptions and use of it. One parish realizes their conscious desire to intensify the sense of community not by being exclusive, but by accelerating activity within the parish and providing manifold opportunity for the members of the community to reach out to inhabitants of the greater neighborhood and city. By contrast, the other parish, after a turnover of ethnic groups in its constituency, has closed in on itself and reinforces a communal identity established with the tools of ecclesiastical dogma and purified ethnic identity. The contrast between the two parishes gives me the basis from which I can investigate an architectural language which appears to be essential in a conscious support of community life in our cities . The fundamentals of this language are described in the sections on "communal space " and "founded space". The formation of these two archetypes of community space is usually achieved through a dialectical process, where founded space is the built memory and again the seed for the flourishing of communal space; and a space. in which an active community thrives is always a response to and a re-formation of a space already founded.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityChristine Macy.en_US
dc.format.extentvii, 1-108 p., 109-158 leavesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectArchitecture.en_US
dc.titleHow community is expressed in place : spatial manifestations of two parishesen_US
dc.title.alternativeSpatial manifestations of two parishesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.Arch.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture
dc.identifier.oclc13172644en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record