Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHarvey J. Bryan.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNess, Richard Een_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-23T20:20:10Z
dc.date.available2013-01-23T20:20:10Z
dc.date.copyright1984en_US
dc.date.issued1984en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/76545
dc.descriptionThesis (M.S.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 1984.en_US
dc.descriptionMICROFICHE COPY AVAILABLE IN ARCHIVES AND ROTCHen_US
dc.descriptionVita.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 77-81).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the major factors which inhibit and foster the integration and application of research knowledge with design practice. The results are presented in two parts: Part I, a generic user handbook, and Part II, a series of case studies dealing with specific matters in research and design. Part 1: RESEARCH AND DESIGN, presents various relationships between scientific inquiry and intuitive design in as broad a context as is possible. Six chapters are arranged to illustrate definitions, major players, · incentives, barriers, solutions, and communications methods. Part II: METHODS FOR INTEGRATION, presents situations and tools which assist in the integration of research and design. Six case studies identify the following methods: design competitions, grantsmanship, financial tools, research methods, and business development strategies. Together, Part I and Part II are intended to serve as a useful tool for researchers and designers to aid in understanding and executing an integration of architectural research and architectural design. This book can be used as a teaching and learning aid in architectural schools, conferences or symposia, as a useful method for transferring technology from other disciplines, or as a design practitioner's tool in determining economic feasibility for applications of building technology to the built environment. A conclusion drawn from this investigation is that sufficient demand must be created before optimum communication is reached between the research and design communities. This research addresses this fundamental requirement by seeking to motivate researchers and designers with moral, legal, and economic incentives, and cost-effective methods.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Richard E. Ness.en_US
dc.format.extent[181] p. in various pagingsen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectArchitecture.en_US
dc.titleResearch and design : methods for integrationen_US
dc.title.alternativeResearch and practice design in architecture : incentives for a synthesisen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.S.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture
dc.identifier.oclc11709750en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record