Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPolina Golland.en_US
dc.contributor.authorArbisser, Amelia Men_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-14T15:15:57Z
dc.date.available2013-02-14T15:15:57Z
dc.date.copyright2012en_US
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/76905
dc.descriptionThesis (M. Eng.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2012.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 45-46).en_US
dc.description.abstractWe investigate automating the task of segmenting structures in head and neck CT scans, to minimize time spent on manual contouring of structures of interest. We focus on the brainstem and left and right parotids. To generate contours for an unlabeled image, we employ an atlas of labeled training images. We register each of these images to the unlabeled target image, transform their structures, and then use a weighted voting method for label fusion. Our registration method starts with multi-resolution translational alignment, then applies a relatively higher resolution affine alignment. We then employ a diffeomorphic demons registration to deform each atlas to the space of the target image. Our weighted voting method considers one structure at a time to determine for each voxel whether or not it belongs to the structure. The weight for a voxel's vote from each atlas depends on the intensity difference of the target and the transformed gray scale atlas image at that voxel, in addition to the distance of that voxel from the boundary of the structure. We evaluate the method on a dataset of sixteen labeled images, generating automatic segmentations for each using the other fifteen images as the atlas. We evaluated the weighted voting method and a majority voting method by comparing the resulting segmentations to the manual segmentations using a volume overlap metric and the distances between contours. Both methods produce accurate segmentations, our method producing contours with boundaries usually only a few millimeters away from the manual contour. This could save physicians considerable time, because they only have to make small modifications to the outline instead of contouring the entire structure.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Amelia M. Arbisser.en_US
dc.format.extent46 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectElectrical Engineering and Computer Science.en_US
dc.titleMulti-atlas segmentation in head and neck CT scansen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.Eng.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
dc.identifier.oclc824133385en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record