Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDavid M. Geltner.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJones, Ryan Hunteren_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Development.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-15T14:41:08Z
dc.date.available2013-02-15T14:41:08Z
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/77123
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M. in Real Estate Development)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Program in Real Estate Development in Conjunction with the Center for Real Estate, 2012.en_US
dc.description"September 2012." Cataloged from department-submitted PDF version of thesis. This electronic version was submitted and approved by the author's academic department as part of an electronic thesis pilot project. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 82-84).en_US
dc.description.abstractCommercial Real Estate is a large asset class, increasingly owned by professional investment managers. Investment managers need a thorough understanding of the risk return relationship and tools to adequate implement sound investing, portfolio management and risk management strategies. Equilibrium asset pricing models are tools that identify and quantify the risk factors priced by the capital market and establish risk adjusted LONG RUN expected returns. This thesis creates portfolios of properties by property type, geographic location and asset size. Total return indices are created for each portfolio to test single factor and multifactor asset pricing models cross sectionally within the commercial real estate asset class. Historical total return data is used from three sources including: NCREIF; the stock market-based FTSE NAREIT Pure-Property Index Series; and a novel "synthetic" total return index created by the researcher from the repeat sale transaction-based Moody's/RCA CPPI Indices. The asset pricing model test results for the NCREIF and PureProperty indices show that a substantial amount of the variation in LONG RUN total return can be explained by a portfolio's beta with respect to a market index and property specific variables such as property type, location and asset size. The asset pricing model test results for the RCA indices were poor and failed to explain the cross-section of commercial real estate returns. Thus, it appears that certain parts of the commercial real estate market may be operating without a systematic relationship of risk and return.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Ryan Hunter Jones.en_US
dc.format.extent106 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectCenter for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Development.en_US
dc.titleRisk and return in institutional commercial real estate : a fresh look with new dataen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.in Real Estate Developmenten_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Development.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Real Estate
dc.identifier.oclc825113597en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record