MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Libraries
  • MIT Theses
  • Doctoral Theses
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Libraries
  • MIT Theses
  • Doctoral Theses
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Essays on financial economics

Author(s)
Vargas Mendoza, Alberto
Thumbnail
DownloadFull printable version (9.987Mb)
Other Contributors
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Economics.
Advisor
Victor Chernozhukov and Anna Mikusheva.
Terms of use
M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
This thesis consists of three independent essays on Financial Economics. In chapter one I investigate the possible mispricing of European-style options in the Mexican Stock Exchange. The source of this problem is that when the Mexican Stock Exchange introduced options over its main index (the IPC) in 2004, it chose Heston's (1993) "square root" stochastic volatility model to price them on days when there was no trading. I investigate whether Heston's model is a good specification for the IPC and whether more elaborate models produce significantly different option prices. To do so, I use an MCMC technique to estimate four different models within the stochastic volatility family. I then present both classical and Bayesian diagnostics for the different models. Finally, I use the transform analysis proposed by Duffie, Pan and Singleton (2000) to price the options and show that the prices implied by the models with jumps are significantly different from those implied by the model currently used by the exchange. Next, I turn to a problem in behavioral portfolio choice: It has been shown that the portfolio choice problem faced by a behavioral agent that maximizes Choquet expected utility is equivalent to solving a quantile linear regression. However, if the agent faces a vast set of assets or when transaction fees are considerable, it becomes optimal for the agent to take non-zero positions on only a subset of the available assets. Thus, in chapter 2, I present a portfolio construction procedure for this context using Li penalized quantile regression methods and explore the performance of these portfolios relative to their unrestricted counterparts. In chapter three, co-authored with Victor Chernozhukov, we present the Extended Pareto Law as an alternative for modeling operational losses. Through graphical examination and formal goodness of fit tests we show that it outperforms the main parsimonious alternative, Extreme Value Theory, in terms of statistical fit. Finally, we show that using the Extended Pareto Law as a modeling technique also leads to reasonable capital requirements.
Description
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Economics, 2012.
 
Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
 
Includes bibliographical references.
 
Date issued
2012
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/77873
Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
Publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Keywords
Economics.

Collections
  • Doctoral Theses

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.