Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAnne Whiston Spirn.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSwartwood, Merran (Merran Elizabeth)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.coverage.spatialn-us-nyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-13T16:25:19Z
dc.date.available2013-03-13T16:25:19Z
dc.date.copyright2012en_US
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/77879
dc.descriptionThesis (M.C.P.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2012.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 43-46).en_US
dc.description.abstractGuerrilla gardening is the practice of illicitly cultivating land that does not belong to the gardener. In New York City, it emerged in the context of disinvestment and urban renewal in the 1970s as a means to clean up vacant lots, improve safety, and build social networks within neighborhoods. This study examines contemporary guerrilla gardening projects in New York and addresses the questions of whether guerrilla gardening today can still offer advantages over gardening with permission, and if there are situations in which it makes more sense to garden without permission, versus the alternate position that gardeners should always seek permission to use the land they cultivate in order to protect their interests and investment. The projects studied range from artistic to political, personal to ideological, outside to inside the system of land ownership. They fall along a continuum of sanctioned and unsanctioned work and, to varying degrees of success, exercise strategies of engagement, permission, and advocacy to achieve their goals. Although the importance of permission depends on the context and objectives of a given project, guerrilla gardening offers real advantages: it is flexible, presents a low barrier to entry, disrupts patterns of thought, raises awareness of alternative options for action, and allows actors to learn from experience. These findings raise questions regarding whether and how cities should accommodate such efforts.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Merran Swartwood.en_US
dc.format.extent48 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectUrban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.titleThe guerrilla in the garden/en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.C.P.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
dc.identifier.oclc828677033en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record