Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRanko Bon.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMaxwell, Marc Aen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-06T17:51:51Z
dc.date.available2013-05-06T17:51:51Z
dc.date.copyright1985en_US
dc.date.issued1985en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/78826
dc.descriptionThesis (M. Arch.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 1985.en_US
dc.descriptionMICROFICHE COPY AVAILABLE IN ARCHIVES AND ROTCH.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 247-251).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis is an investigation into design methodologies. How do we, as designers, prepare ourselves for decision making and evaluate our assumptions and decisions? The intent is to employ this information as a basis for integration of architectural design processes with economic principles, decision methods and management techniques widely used in related disciplines. Given that architects do use heuristics based on common knowledge and values, it is appropriate to analyze these constructs. Re-evaluation, in light of changes in society, technology and the practice of our profession, will enhance the usefulness of such techniques. The myriad of decisions required in all design processes force the designer to economize. Conventions are employed to save designers from the rediscovery of past solutions. Once a procedure or physical configuration has been accepted into our 'set of rules', how is it kept current and consistent with its original intent? How can we use more analytical procedures (i.e., life-cycle costing) to heighten our understanding of the designs we create. Integration of architectural design into the larger process of building development is a parallel concern. As buildings become more complex, so too does the process of designing them. How architects interact with their clients and users can determine the success o r failure of a project . The relationships established between collaborators in each design exercise, also influence both the process and the product of our efforts. This study is the author's search for a more systematic and integrated approach to challenging or corroborating existing conventions. Formalizing their uses and organizing the process of acquiring such procedures is equally important. The value of such heuristics is greater efficiency in the building design process. Understanding of the overall development process can help designers make more informed decisions, leading to better designs and buildings. The intent of this study is to illustrate that issues confronting the architect's client can aid the designer in his/her tasks and selections without unduly constraining design goals and inspiration.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Marc A. Maxwell.en_US
dc.format.extent251 leavesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectArchitecture.en_US
dc.titleInforming design decisions : an approach to corporate building designen_US
dc.title.alternativeCorporate building design, An approach toen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.Arch.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture
dc.identifier.oclc13172763en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record