Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAcemoglu, Daron
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, James
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-05T20:24:31Z
dc.date.available2013-06-05T20:24:31Z
dc.date.issued2013-06-05
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/79064
dc.description.abstractThe standard approach to policy-making and advice in economics implicitly or explicitly ignores politics and political economy, and maintains that if possible, any market failure should be rapidly removed. This essay explains why this conclusion may be incorrect; because it ignores politics, this approach is oblivious to the impact of the removal of market failures on future political equilibria and economic efficiency, which can be deleterious. We first outline a simple framework for the study of the impact of current economic policies on future political equilibria and indirectly on future economic outcomes. We then illustrate the mechanisms through which such impacts might operate using a series of examples. The main message is that sound economic policy should be based on a careful analysis of political economy and should factor in its influence on future political equilibria.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCambridge, MA: Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMIT Department of Economics Working Paper Series;13-08
dc.subjecteconomic policyen_US
dc.subjectmarket failuresen_US
dc.subjectpolicy adviceen_US
dc.subjectpolitical economyen_US
dc.subjectpoliticsen_US
dc.titleEconomics versus Politics: Pitfalls of Policy Adviceen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record