MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Libraries
  • MIT Theses
  • Doctoral Theses
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Libraries
  • MIT Theses
  • Doctoral Theses
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The impact of history and institutions on economic development

Author(s)
Lakshmi Iyer
Thumbnail
DownloadFull printable version (9.412Mb)
Other Contributors
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Economics.
Advisor
Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo.
Terms of use
M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
This thesis examines the impact of political and legal institutions on economic development. The thesis consists of three studies analyzing specific historical and current institutions. The first chapter examines the impact of colonial rule on economic outcomes. I compare areas in India which were under the direct control of British administrators with areas which were ruled by local Indian rulers under indirect colonial control. Controlling for potential selection bias in British annexation policy, I find that British-ruled areas have significantly lower levels of public goods in the post-colonial period. These differences were present in the colonial period itself, and are narrowing after the end of colonial rule, suggesting the importance of local administrative control in the provision of public goods. The second chapter (co-authored with Abhijit Banerjee) focuses on the land revenue systems instituted by British colonial rulers for the collection of land revenue in India. We find that areas in which proprietary rights in land were historically given to landlords have significantly lower agricultural investments and productivity in the post-colonial period, compared to areas in which land rights were given to the cultivators. We verify that these differences are not driven by omitted variables or endogeneity of the historical institutions. They probably arise because of different post-colonial policy choices: landlord-dominated areas seem to have concentrated more on reducing inequality, while non-landlord areas do better at poverty reduction. The third chapter (co-authored with Quy-Toan Do) examines the impact of the 1993 Land Law in Viet Nam, which gave households the power to exchange, transfer, lease, inherit and mortgage their land-use rights.
 
(cont.) We use a difference-in-differences estimation strategy to identify the impact of this law, taking advantage of the variation across provinces in the issuance of land-use certificates needed to enforce these rights. Our results indicate that the additional land rights led to significant increases in the share of total cultivated area devoted to multi-year crops, as well as some increase in irrigation investment. Overall, the results suggest a strong and long-lasting impact of property rights institutions and historical factors on economic development.
 
Description
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Economics, 2003.
 
Includes bibliographical references (p. 129-133).
 
Date issued
2003
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/8040
Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
Publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Keywords
Economics.

Collections
  • Doctoral Theses

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.