MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Libraries
  • MIT Theses
  • Doctoral Theses
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Libraries
  • MIT Theses
  • Doctoral Theses
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

On proprietary disclosures of investment institutions

Author(s)
Ko, K. Jeremy (Kwangmin Jeremy), 1973-
Thumbnail
DownloadFull printable version (5.159Mb)
Other Contributors
Sloan School of Management.
Advisor
Dimitri Vayanos.
Terms of use
M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
We analyze issues related to proprietary disclosures by specialized investment institutions such as hedge funds to their trading counterparties and creditors. In this paper, disclosure can be costly because of the potential for exploitation through competitive trade or "front-running". In chapter 1, we consider a model with a direct revelation mechanism between leveraged investors and their lenders. In this model, the investors need to borrow from lenders with heterogeneous risk-exposures in order to trade. Investors may obtain advantageous terms of borrowing by disclosing their investment strategy, thereby revealing its correlation to the lender's existing risk-exposure. Investors risk being "front-run" by their lender if they disclose, however. We show that in the presence of front-running, the "unraveling" result of full disclosure may not hold. Mandating disclosure has ambiguous welfare effects since it can not only lead to the matching of uncorrelated risks, but also to concentrations of risk. These results have implications for regulations on leveraged investors in financial markets. In chapter 2, we consider an indirect revelation made by an arbitrageur (e.g., hedge fund) to trading counterparties through traded securities. In this model, the arbitrageur has private information about the relative value of two or more securities. We conjecture that in a segmented dealer market, the arbitrageur trades each security with a different dealer so that each dealer sees only one piece of the total position. We show that this "break-up" strategy can be optimal and unique even if given an array of redundant strategies and securities, including "swaps" of the various securities. The analysis of this equilibrium has implications for the kinds of claims held by an arbitrageur's counterparties in a leveraged scenario and their resulting stability.
Description
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2003.
 
Includes bibliographical references (p. 73-74).
 
Date issued
2003
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/8043
Department
Sloan School of Management
Publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Keywords
Sloan School of Management.

Collections
  • Doctoral Theses

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.