Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorKenneth A. Oye.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTurlington, Ralph Donald, IIIen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-24T18:22:27Z
dc.date.available2013-09-24T18:22:27Z
dc.date.copyright2013en_US
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/80897
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M. in Technology and Policy)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, 2013.en_US
dc.descriptionThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 102-108).en_US
dc.description.abstractDNA synthesis technologies are advancing at exponential rates, with production of ever longer, more complex, and less expensive sequences of double stranded DNA. This has fostered development of industrial scale design, construction, and sale of synthetic DNA. The tools and methods of synthesis used to create beneficial genetic material can also be used to construct dangerous pathogens. To prevent unknown actors from ordering potentially dangerous genetic material, the largest DNA synthesis firms formed two industry associations that require members to screen the DNA sequences ordered and the customers ordering sequences. The firms also worked with the U.S. Health and Human Services to formulate voluntary screening guidelines for synthetic double stranded DNA. As DNA synthesis technology advances and diffuses, this centralized voluntary approach may become less effective. This thesis identifies strengths and weakness in the current voluntary regime and offers recommendations to improve security in the DNA synthesis industry. It describes the origins and current status of DNA synthesis technologies and the structure of the DNA synthesis industry. Then, it describes the formation of voluntary screening consortia and the U.S. and international guidelines that address security issues in DNA synthesis. Finally, this thesis compares DNA synthesis with other potentially "dual use" technologies, concludes that regulatory approaches may not enhance security in this area, and suggests that governments should focus on education and outreach.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Ralph Donald Turlington III.en_US
dc.format.extent108 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectEngineering Systems Division.en_US
dc.titleMitigating security issues in the evolving DNA synthesis industryen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.in Technology and Policyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division
dc.identifier.oclc858280644en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record