Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBruce Cameron and Bradley Morrison.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFreeman, Carolyn Marieen_US
dc.contributor.otherLeaders for Global Operations Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-24T19:35:52Z
dc.date.available2013-09-24T19:35:52Z
dc.date.copyright2013en_US
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/80996
dc.descriptionThesis (M.B.A.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management; and, (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division; in conjunction with the Leaders for Global Operations Program at MIT, 2013.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 55-56).en_US
dc.description.abstractSikorsky is currently negotiating the SDTA proposal for the CH-53K helicopter. Due to the Truth In Negotiations Act (TINA), when submitting a proposal to the government all suppliers with a total award greater than $700,000 need to have supporting documentation (material substantiation) showing that pricing is fair and reasonable. This can be accomplished through competition, a cost-price analysis (CPA), or commerciality. Each entity involved in the proposal prefers a different substantiation method: the government prefers CPA or competition, the suppliers prefer commerciality, and Sikorsky prefers competition. Because the government and suppliers have opposing views on commerciality, the government has increased the oversight and complexity of the commercial process. Previously, a proposal's commerciality claims required only a commerciality claim form and an invoice showing that the part had been sold to a commercial entity, but did not require the supplier to provide the commercial invoice price. For the SDTA proposal, an approved commerciality claim required a commerciality form, non-redacted invoices showing pricing information and the customer to which the part was sold, an escalated price analysis to support price reasonableness, a detailed list of modifications to the commercial part, an estimated cost of the modifications, and final commercial end user information. The commercial process involved roughly 90 Sikorsky employees and required roughly 11 months to fulfill all of the government's SDTA commercial requirements. As a comparison, CPA substantiation was completed 4 months prior to commerciality. Reasons for the long cycle time include labor time, a lengthy paper internal approval process including process downtime, lost or misprocessed documents, and insufficient employee training. To combat these inefficiencies, a formalized commercial substantiation process that uses an electronic workspace to provide process control is proposed in this thesis. The formalized commercial substantiation process decreases the required labor hours by an estimated 43%, decreases the internal approval cycle time by 74%, and provides secure document management. These improvements not only benefit the company internally, but also provide external benefits like an increase in government satisfaction which will help Sikorsky attain additional government contracts.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Carolyn Marie Freeman.en_US
dc.format.extent67 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.subjectEngineering Systems Division.en_US
dc.subjectLeaders for Global Operations Program.en_US
dc.titleProcess improvement and analytics of commercial material substantiationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.description.degreeM.B.A.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentLeaders for Global Operations Program at MITen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.identifier.oclc857789064en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record