Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRoy Welsch and Deborah Nightingale.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSommerkorn, Peter (Peter Wilford)en_US
dc.contributor.otherLeaders for Global Operations Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-24T19:37:21Z
dc.date.available2013-09-24T19:37:21Z
dc.date.copyright2013en_US
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/81018
dc.descriptionThesis (M.B.A.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management; and, (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division; in conjunction with the Leaders for Global Operations Program at MIT, 2013.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 61).en_US
dc.description.abstractA significant amount of complexity exists within the brand and product portfolios of PharmaCo. This complexity is driven by several factors: first, medical needs for differing products and dosages; second, marketing requests for new configurations of current product offerings; third, unique regulations and requirements for individual country markets; fourth, product portfolio growth from acquisition activity. This complexity increases both production costs and support costs (such as planning and procurement) for PharmaCo. The focus of this project is to reduce the complexity in the brand and SKU portfolios at PharmaCo. Two approaches can be utilized to reduce complexity in the product portfolio. First, measures can be taken to reduce already existing SKUs and brands. This has largely been the focus of previous efforts at PharmaCo, although additional work remains in this area. Previous analyses have focused on providing recommendations for pruning specific SKUs and divesting or pruning specific brands. Second, measures can be taken to manage the future proliferation of SKUs and brands in order to control future complexity growth. This approach has been largely unaddressed in previous internship projects and will be a major focus of the current project. It is first necessary to clearly understand all costs that are associated with complexity. Consequently, the first step of this project was to conduct site visits with multiple plants in order to learn all costs that are impacted by complexity. At these site visits, cross functional groups involved in all aspects of operations at the site were identified and consulted. Additionally, Marketing was contacted to understand complexity costs that affect Marketing. Both cost elements will be combined to develop a complexity cost model. This model is being piloted and applied to a stable brand that still has level or increasing volumes over the next several years.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Peter Sommerkorn.en_US
dc.format.extent61 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.subjectEngineering Systems Division.en_US
dc.subjectLeaders for Global Operations Program.en_US
dc.titleComplexity management through product portfolio cost modeling and optimizationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.description.degreeM.B.A.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentLeaders for Global Operations Program at MITen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.identifier.oclc857790371en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record