MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Libraries
  • MIT Theses
  • Graduate Theses
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Libraries
  • MIT Theses
  • Graduate Theses
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Exploring the use of a higher octane gasoline for the U.S. light-duty vehicle fleet

Author(s)
Chow, Eric W
Thumbnail
DownloadFull printable version (17.21Mb)
Alternative title
Exploring the use of a higher octane gasoline for the United States light-duty vehicle fleet
Other Contributors
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering.
Advisor
John B. Heywood.
Terms of use
M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
This thesis explores the possible benefits that can be achieved if U.S. oil companies produced and offered a grade of higher-octane gasoline to the consumer market. The octane number of a fuel represents how resistant the fuel is to auto-ignition, which causes knock. By raising the octane number of gasoline, engine knock constraints are reduced, so that new spark-ignition engines can be designed with higher compression ratios and boost levels. In turn, engine and vehicle efficiencies are improved thus reducing fuel consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for the light-duty vehicle (LDV) fleet. The main objective of this thesis is to quantify the reduction in fuel consumption and GHG emissions that can be achieved for a given increase in octane number. Engine modeling simulations in GT-Power are used to determine the relative brake efficiency gain (part-load) that is possible for a unit increase in compression ratio. This is found to be 1.9% while literature data suggests a 2.33%-2.8% efficiency gain may in fact be possible. Thus an average relative efficiency gain of 2.35% is assumed possible for a unit increase in compression ratio. Engine-in-vehicle drive-cycle simulations are then performed in Autonomie to determine an effective, on-the-road vehicle efficiency gain. For a compression ratio increase of 1.5:1, this results in a 4.7% efficiency gain for a downsized, naturally-aspirated, spark-ignition vehicle. If the vehicle is turbocharged, a 6.9% efficiency gain is possible due to additional boosting and further downsizing. With the possible efficiency gain determined at an individual vehicle level, a fleet model is then used to calculate the aggregate benefit for the LDV fleet by simulating the deployment and adoption rate of vehicles redesigned for higher octane gasoline. According to results from the model, roughly 69% of all LDVs on the road by 2040 will be of this high-octane variety that uses premium gasoline (98 RON). Meanwhile, premium gasoline is projected to account for almost 80% of the total gasoline demand by 2040. Ultimately by redesigning vehicles to take advantage of 98 RON gasoline, fuel consumption and GHG emissions for the fleet can be reduced by about 4.5% over the baseline case, where no high-octane vehicles are introduced. This reduction jumps to 6.0% if 100 RON gasoline is considered instead.
Description
Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, 2013.
 
Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
 
Includes bibliographical references (p. 64-67).
 
Date issued
2013
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/81597
Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
Publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Keywords
Mechanical Engineering.

Collections
  • Graduate Theses

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.