Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJulian Beinart.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZeiber, Kristen (Kristen Ann)en_US
dc.contributor.otherTennessee Valley Authority.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-18T19:04:24Z
dc.date.available2013-11-18T19:04:24Z
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/82287
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M. in Architecture Studies)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 2013.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis. "June 2013."en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 156-161).en_US
dc.description.abstractAs the flagship of the New Deal, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) was a triumph of regional and environmental design that has since fallen on hard times. When writer James Agee toured the region in 1935, he described the massive dam construction underway as a great skeleton across the valley, to be fleshed with social programs; economic incentives; navigation; flood control; power; and economic development. There were planned towns, parkways, jobs, and cheap energy - a regional utopia. Eighty years later, what remains of that skeleton is a static system of dams and their reservoirs, and an aging power grid more reliant on heavily polluting fossil fuels than hydroelectric power. The program is heavily in debt, regularly challenged to privatize and decentralize. Meanwhile, the TVA's region has reoriented itself along new programmatic and spatial lines, increasingly relegating the TVA to irrelevant anachronism. Today's TVA is an important American landscape facing obsolescence, largely due to organizational ossification and a failure to adapt to changing attitudes towards environmental management. Using the Tennessee River as a conceptual and physical bounding device, this thesis revisits the original goals of the TVA and critically examines their contemporary incarnation. The thesis then maps the TVA's remant components in order to explore how a relatively rigid and anachronistic regional plan may be retrofitted within a wholly different economic and political climate in order to rescue it from gradual decline. Ultimately, the thesis argues that rather than reinstituting the original New Deal toolkit, a contemporary retrofit could instead take the form of a flexible series of minimal components around three lenses of intervention: the public; ecology; and energy. These can then be layered onto the existing network to reframe its symbolism for the 21st century. In this way, the project identifies points of entry for grafting contemporary uses and meanings onto the TVA's remnant spine.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Kristen Zeiber.en_US
dc.format.extent167, [1] p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectArchitecture.en_US
dc.subjectTennessee Valley Authority.en_US
dc.titleRetrofitting the Tennessee Valley Authorityen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.in Architecture Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture
dc.identifier.oclc861229902en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record