Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHaynes Miller.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHaugseng, Runeen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mathematics.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-18T19:23:21Z
dc.date.available2013-11-18T19:23:21Z
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/82438
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mathematics, 2013.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 189-190).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe goal of this thesis is to begin to lay the foundations for a theory of enriched [infinity]categories. We introduce a definition of such objects, based on a non-symmetric version of Lurie's theory of [infinity]-operads. Our first main result is a construction of the correct homotopy theory of enriched [infinity]-categories as a localization of an "algebraic" homotopy theory defined using [infinity]-operads; this is joint work with David Gepner. We then prove some comparison results: When a monoidal [infinity]-category arises from a nice monoidal model category we show that the associated homotopy theory of enriched [infinity]-categories is equivalent to the homotopy theory induced by the model category of enriched categories; when the monoidal structure is the Cartesian product we also show that this is equivalent to the homotopy theory of enriched Segal categories. Moreover, we prove that the homotopy theory of ([infinity], n)-categories enriched in spaces, obtained by iterating our enrichment procedure, is equivalent to that of n-fold complete Segal spaces. We also introduce notions of natural transformations and correspondences in the setting of enriched [infinity]-categories, and use these to construct (co,2)-categories of enriched cocategories, functors, and natural transformations, and double co-categories of enriched [infinity]-categories, functors, and correspondences. Finally, we briefly discuss a non-iterative definition of enriched ([infinity], n)-categories, based on a version of [infinity]-operads over Joyal's categories On, and define what should be the correct [infinity]-category of these.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Rune Haugseng.en_US
dc.format.extent190 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectMathematics.en_US
dc.titleWeakly enriched higher categoriesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mathematics
dc.identifier.oclc862974838en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record