Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHerbert H. Einstein.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDonohue, Catherine, M. Eng. Massachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-06T20:45:07Z
dc.date.available2013-12-06T20:45:07Z
dc.date.copyright2013en_US
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/82811
dc.descriptionThesis (M. Eng.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2013.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 79-81).en_US
dc.description.abstractMinimizing the uncertainty in predicting the critical gradient of a dam (i.e. the critical reservoir pool level) is important during the risk analysis of dams. Uncertainty leads to inexact relative risk in portfolio management; therefore it is essential to get as accurate a risk estimation as possible for each project in a portfolio. To understand the uncertainty inherent in the predictive methodologies, this thesis sets out to compare the two most commonly used predictive methodologies, Sellmeijer and Schmertmann, in the USACE portfolio in order to make a suggestion of when to use which. Both methodologies have been calibrated for a small range of ideal soil characteristics that may not reflect of existing conditions of the portfolio. This thesis concludes with the recommendation to broaden the range of applicability through additional experiments that include anisotropic conditions.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Catherine Donohue.en_US
dc.format.extent103 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectCivil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.titleCritical gradient for internal erosion in earthen d ams : a comparative analysis of two predictive methodologiesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.Eng.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc862809648en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record