Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJohn B. Heywood.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Raymond (Raymond A.)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-06T15:45:38Z
dc.date.available2014-03-06T15:45:38Z
dc.date.copyright2013en_US
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/85488
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2013.en_US
dc.descriptionPage 62 blank. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (page 61).en_US
dc.description.abstractGasoline - ethanol blends were explored as a strategy to mitigate engine knock, a phenomena in spark ignition engine combustion when a portion of the end gas is compressed to the point of spontaneous auto-ignition. This auto-ignition is dangerous to the operation of an internal combustion engine, as it can severely damage engine components. As engine designers are trying to improve the efficiency of the internal combustion engine, engine knock is a key limiting factor in engine design. Two methods have been used to limit engine knock that will be considered here; retarding the spark timing and addition of additives to reduce the tendency of the fuel mixture to knock. Both have drawbacks. Retarding spark reduces the engine efficiency and additives typically lower the heating value of the fuel, requiring more fuel for a given operating point. To study this problem a turbocharged engine was tested with a variety of combinations of gasoline and ethanol, an additive with very good anti-knock abilities. Pressure was recorded and GT Power simulations were used to determine the temperature within the cylinder. An effective octane number was calculated to measure the ability of the fuel to resist knock. Effective octane numbers varied from 91 for UTG91 to 111 for E25, respectively. Engine simulations were used to extrapolate to points that couldn't be tested in the experimental setup and generate performance maps which could be used to predict how the engine would act inside of a vehicle. It was found that increasing the compression ratio from 9.2 to 13.5 leads to a 7% relative increase in part load efficiency. When applied in a vehicle this leads to a 2-6% increase in miles per gallon of gasoline consumption depending on the drive cycle used. Miles per gallon of ethanol used were significantly higher than gasoline; 141 miles per gallon of ethanol was the lowest mileage over all cycles studied.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Raymond Lewis.en_US
dc.format.extent62 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectMechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.titleHigh compression ratio turbo gasoline engine operation using alcohol enhancementen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc870998515en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record