Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJoel P. Clark.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKelkar, Ashish S. (Ashish Sadashiv), 1974-en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Technology and Policy Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2005-08-23T21:39:18Z
dc.date.available2005-08-23T21:39:18Z
dc.date.copyright2000en_US
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/8605
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Technology and Policy Program, February 2001.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 66-67).en_US
dc.description.abstractAlthough the use of Aluminum in cars has been increasing for the past two decades, there has been limited progress in the development of aluminum auto bodies. Although some carmakers have developed all aluminum spaceframe designs, aluminum is far from being a material of choice for autobodies. Most aluminum substitution has come in the form of castings and forgings in the transmission, wheels etc. The substitution of steel by aluminum is partly influenced by the regulatory pressures to meet fuel efficiency standards by lightweighting and recycling standards. The thesis looks at the possible reasons-both regulatory pressures and market forces as to why aluminum has been a part by part substitute for steel rather than for the entire autobody. The key obstacle is the high cost of primary aluminum as compared to steel. Both the aluminum and the automotive industries have made attempts in their respective areas to make aluminum a cost-effective alternative to steel. The thesis looks at the possible options for the aluminum industry in the current macroeconomic conditions including scale economies and cost analysis of newer rolling technologies. The thesis then analyzes the cost of fabrication and assembly of four different aluminum car body designs compared with the conventional steel designs. The cost of the car design depends on the how cost effective that the aluminum producers can be in producing the primary aluminum. We then attempt to analyze if the aluminum can be an alternative to steel at lower primary aluminum prices, if these can be feasible and the possible implications for the aluminum producers and the regulators.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Ashish S. Kelkar.en_US
dc.format.extent73 leavesen_US
dc.format.extent8439962 bytes
dc.format.extent8439719 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectTechnology and Policy Program.en_US
dc.titleAnalysis of aluminum in auto body designs and its strategic implications for the aluminum industryen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentTechnology and Policy Program
dc.identifier.oclc49340496en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record