Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSandra C. Howell.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDuerk, Donna Pen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-19T17:29:59Z
dc.date.available2014-08-19T17:29:59Z
dc.date.copyright1980en_US
dc.date.issued1980en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/88795
dc.descriptionThesis (M. Arch. A.S.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 1980.en_US
dc.descriptionMICROFICHE COPY AVAILABLE IN ARCHIVES AND ROTCH.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 127-133).en_US
dc.description.abstractDesigning environments to accommodate people in wheelchairs is far more than ramps and wide toilet stalls built according to the state building code. This study attempts to illuminate the functional imperatives behind certain standards (especially relating to spinal cord injuries) and to show how families with chair-bound members actually use their homes. There are seven case studies in the body of this work ranging from a situation where both parents are disabled to the typical nuclear family with only one disabled parent to 'families' composed of unrelated individuals sharing a home. Use of each house is illustrated via a diary-generated daily routine as well as by a house evaluation showing the adapted and unadapted features. The case studies are heavily illustrated with photographs. The final chapters discuss the issues and themes that emerged from the study and propose a model of individual competence that is based on an equilibrium among various options for adapting behavior and/ or physical surroundings. Prioritized standards are proposed, parallel to ANSI A117.1-1977, that advocate broad application of minimum accessibility standards, narrower application of acceptable accessibility standards and specialized application of adaptive accessibility standards. This proposal is made in order that a wider range of housing choices be made available to families with chair-bound member(s). In general it was found that most requirements for accessibility did not interfere with the needs of the ambulatory - except in the requirements for counter heights in the kitchen.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Donna P. Duerk.en_US
dc.format.extent[1], viii, 144 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectArchitecture.en_US
dc.subject.lccTH4812en_US
dc.subject.lcshPeople with disabilities Housingen_US
dc.subject.lcshBarrier-free designen_US
dc.titleEnabling environments : people, wheelchairs and standardsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.Arch.A.S.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture
dc.identifier.oclc07346545en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record