Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMalik, Mushtaq Ahmaden_US
dc.contributor.authorKamal, Altamashen_US
dc.contributor.authorDriscoll, Michael J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLanning, David D.en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Energy Laboratoryen_US
dc.contributor.otherUnited States. Department of Energy. Office of Energy Technologyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-15T17:52:20Z
dc.date.available2014-09-15T17:52:20Z
dc.date.issued1981en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/89539
dc.descriptionStatement of responsibility on title-page reads: M.A. Malik, A. Kamal, M.J. Driscoll, and D.D. Lanningen_US
dc.description"November 1981."en_US
dc.descriptionOriginally presented as the first author's M.S. thesis, M.I.T. Dept. of Nuclear Engineering, 1981en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 112-114)en_US
dc.description.abstractAnalytical and numerical methods have been applied to find the optimum axial power profile in a PWR with respect to uranium utilization. The preferred shape was found to have a large central region of uniform power density, with a roughly cosinusoidal.profile near the ends of the assembly. Reactivity and fissile enrichment distributions which yield the optimum profile were determined, and a 3-region design was developed which gives essentially the same power profile as the continuously varying optimum composition. State of the art computational methods, LEOPARD and PDQ-7, were used to evaluate the beginning-of-life and burnup history behavior of a series of three-zone assembly designs, all of which had a large central zone followed by a shorter region of higher enrichment, and with a still thinner blanket of depleted uranium fuel pellets at the outer periphery. It was found that if annular fuel pellets were used in the higher enrichment zone, a design ! was created which not only had the best uranium savings (2.8% more energy from the same amount of natural. uranium, compared to a conventional, uniform, unblanketed design), but also had a power shape with a lower peak-to-average power ratio (by 16.5%) than the reference case, and which held its power shape very nearly constant over life. This contrasted with the designs without part length annular fuel, which tended to burn into an end-peaked power distribution, and with blanket-only designs, which had a poorer peak-to-average power ratio than the reference udblanketed case.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDOE contract no. DE-AC02-79ET3402en_US
dc.format.extent114 pagesen_US
dc.publisherCambridge, Mass. : Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Energy Laboratory, 1981en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMITNE ; no. 247en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEnergy Laboratory report (Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Energy Laboratory) ; no. MIT-EL 81-037en_US
dc.subject.lccTK1001.M41 E56 no.81-037en_US
dc.subject.lccTK9008.M41 N96 no.247en_US
dc.subject.lcshPressurized water reactorsen_US
dc.subject.lcshNuclear fuel elements -- Computer programsen_US
dc.titleOptimization of the axial power shape in pressurized water reactorsen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.identifier.oclc09555105en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record