Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorGeorge T. Schmidt.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNuzzo, Nicholas C. (Nicholas Christopher), 1974-en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2005-09-27T19:31:46Z
dc.date.available2005-09-27T19:31:46Z
dc.date.copyright1999en_US
dc.date.issued1999en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/8965
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1999.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 173-176).en_US
dc.description.abstractVarious service vehicles are being developed to resupply the International Space Station (ISS). These service vehicles and the ISS will perform automated space rendezvous. The performance of a relative GPS navigation filter for this application is presented. Specifically, the effects of four different techniques for propagating the filter state are demonstrated and evaluated. These techniques include, (1) integration of the equations of motion accounting for J2, J3, J4 and aerodynamic drag, (2) first-order equations of relative motion that account for the effects of J2 and include a second-order conic approximation, (3) the Universal Keplerian state transition matrix, and (4) the use of the Clohessy-Wiltshire equations of relative motion. GPS measurements were simulated and included errors due to Selective Availability, clock bias, clock drift, and receiver noise. The relative navigation filter used pseudorange and delta-range measurements to estimate the filter state which included the relative position and relative velocity between the vehicles conducting the space rendezvous. The results demonstrated that all four techniques surpassed the performance requirements on relative position and velocity errors. However, integrating the equations of motion, technique (1), resulted in the best performance. The filter state errors for this technique were the smallest and remained within the 3 [sigma] covariance bounds for all the cases studied. Effects due to eccentricity were observed in the remaining propagation techniques with the worst noted in technique (4). The most significant perturbation was shown to be J2, producing significant propagation and filter errors when the state was being propagated by methods (3) and (4), which did not account for it.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Nicholas C. Nuzzo.en_US
dc.format.extent176 p.en_US
dc.format.extent7824275 bytes
dc.format.extent7824035 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectAeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.titleEffects of propagation techniques on relative GPS navigationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
dc.identifier.oclc47027435en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record