Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJohn T. Germaine.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGonzález, Jorge H. (Jorge Hugo), 1971-en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2005-09-27T19:41:51Z
dc.date.available2005-09-27T19:41:51Z
dc.date.copyright2000en_US
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/8985
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2000.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 212-216).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe Constant Rate of Strain (CRS) test provides an efficient and a relatively rapid method to determine properties (stress history, compressibility, hydraulic conductivity, and rate of consolidation) of a cohesive soil and possess many advantages over the incremental oedometer test. Ease of operation and the ability to take frequent readings provides tremendous labor savings and a better definition of the compression curve. However, the test has some disadvantages including, pore pressure measurement errors, initial transient conditions, and strain rate dependent soil behavior. There is also no set standard for the method of analysis to be used for interpretation of the CRS data. This experimental and theoretical study evaluates parameters that affect CRS test results, including strain rate sensitivity, testing device effects, and different methods used to interpret the data. An extensive program was conducted on Resedimented Boston Blue Clay (RBBC) and Resedimented Vicksburg Buckshot Clay (RVBC) to study the behavior during constant rate of strain consolidation. Strain rate sensitivity was measured using the Wissa Constant rate of strain device. Two special CRS tests were performed to evaluate the pore pressure measuring system and to. assess transient conditions. Two analysis methods proposed by Wissa et al. (1971) were scrutinized using a numerical simulation on a model soil. The stiffness of the pore pressure system relative to the soil stiffness is extremely important in tests with high ... Both soils were found to be strain rate sensitive. The softer RVBC had little sensitivity in compression and c, behavior. However, the k, decreased with increasing hydraulic gradient. Stiffer RBBC had a high sensitivity in compression and cv behavior. kv was insensitive to gradient but this observation is believed to be an error caused by the system stiffness. The findings support the use of either the linear or nonlinear theory provided the ... is kept below 0.15. The system stiffness, relative to the soil stiffness, is very important and negatively impacts results as the ... increases. The transient duration is well predicted by Wissa's F3 = 0.4 limit. Based on numerical simulation, it was shown that the established equations to compute k, and c, should be modified to account for large deformations.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Jorge H. Gonzalez.en_US
dc.format.extent293 leavesen_US
dc.format.extent16355832 bytes
dc.format.extent16355583 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectCivil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.titleExperimental and theoretical investigation of constant rate of strain consolidationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc47244730en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record