Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorGabriella Carolini.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSteponaitis, Lillian K. (Lillian Kazimiera)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.coverage.spatials-bl---en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-19T21:40:05Z
dc.date.available2014-09-19T21:40:05Z
dc.date.copyright2014en_US
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/90106
dc.descriptionThesis: M.C.P., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, 2014.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 63-66).en_US
dc.description.abstractCommunity-based organizations are unique in that their success is based not only on the services they offer, but also their more intangible networks of trust, robust local relationships, and on-the-ground knowledge of community needs. As local organizations grow and seek to replicate themselves, the question of local trust and participation, the very basis of their legitimacy, is sometimes challenged. Legitimacy speaks to program success, the continuation of healthy community relationships, and sustained local representation in the organization. Although legitimacy is a concern for growing organizations in the communities they expand to, claims on legitimate leadership and organization begin at home. This paper examines the case of Banco Palmas, the first community organized bank in Brazil, to address the question of how the changing relationships of scale affect Banco Palmas's ability to effectively engage with, and thus legitimately represent, the residents of the neighborhood of Conjunto Palmeiras. Based on information gathered through fieldwork at Banco Palmas and drawing from the literature on empowerment, it is argued the struggle for legitimacy plays out not only between the Palmas organizations and the local residents association, but also in how new members and non-members interact with and participate, or do not participate, in bank activities. These struggles are born out of a discontinuity between personal empowerment and broader community organizing efforts, particularly as they apply to young people and new members. The case points to the importance of linking personal politicization and empowerment to collective organizing through new methods of online engagement.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Lillian K. Steponaitis.en_US
dc.format.extent68 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectUrban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.titleToo legit to quit : exploring concepts of legitimacy and power in scaling-up community development worken_US
dc.title.alternativeToo legitimate to quit : exploring concepts of legitimacy and power in scaling-up community development worken_US
dc.title.alternativeExploring concepts of legitimacy and power in scaling-up community development worken_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.C.P.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
dc.identifier.oclc890144480en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record