Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorCharles H. Fine and Julie A. Shah.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDurham, Bryce J. (Bryce James)en_US
dc.contributor.otherLeaders for Global Operations Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-07T19:17:57Z
dc.date.available2014-10-07T19:17:57Z
dc.date.copyright2014en_US
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/90609
dc.descriptionThesis: M.B.A., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2014. In conjunction with the Leaders for Global Operations Program at MIT.en_US
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2014. In conjunction with the Leaders for Global Operations Program at MIT.en_US
dc.descriptionThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.en_US
dc.description36en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 71-73).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines the application of reconfigurable industrial robotics in the assembly of the engine nacelle inlet for a commercial aircraft. In addition to addressing the achievable level of automation, this thesis also reviews the evaluation of robotics vendor proposals and the accompanying financial justification requisite for implementation. The aircraft industry has long been dominated by manual fabrication and assembly methods. Variability in human skill, however, results in defects, rework, and reduced production throughput. One approach to reduce variability, decrease cycle time, and increase throughput is the implementation of robotic automation for various assembly tasks. Low aircraft production volumes have made it difficult to justify large investments in robotic automation. Decreasing cost and increasing capability of industrial robotics, however, are making investment more palatable. The excellent repeatability of robotic automation can significantly reduce individual task times for a wide range of operations. Standard automated task times are 60{85% lower than standard manual task times for drill and fasten operations which represent the greatest opportunity for cycle time improvements because typical aircraft assembly requires tens of thousands of holes and fasteners. The optimal level of automation is a balance among decreasing manual touch time, improving production capacity, and increasing automation costs. A semi-automated solution is shown to reduce manual touch time by 70% and total touch time by 30%. The implementation of this solution requires an investment of tens of millions of dollars and results in present value savings of hundreds of millions of dollars for the program lifetime.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Bryce J. Durham.en_US
dc.format.extent73 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.subjectAeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.subjectLeaders for Global Operations Program.en_US
dc.titleDetermining appropriate levels of robotic automation in commercial aircraft nacelle assemblyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.B.A.en_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentLeaders for Global Operations Program at MITen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.identifier.oclc891394780en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record