MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Libraries
  • MIT Theses
  • Graduate Theses
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Libraries
  • MIT Theses
  • Graduate Theses
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The evolution of U.S. airlines' productivity and cost performance from 2004-2012

Author(s)
Jiang, QianNan
Thumbnail
DownloadFull printable version (30.35Mb)
Alternative title
Evolution of United States airlines' productivity and cost performance from 2004-2012
Other Contributors
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Advisor
Peter P. Belobaba.
Terms of use
M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
In the past decade, the U.S. airline industry has undergone tremendous transformation triggered by major events such as the surge in fuel prices and the economic recession. Network legacy carriers implemented drastic measures to reduce cost and increase productivity. Some filed bankruptcy protection to restructure, and others pursued mergers for consolidation and cost savings through operational synergies. Low cost carriers have been profitable but are now faced with higher costs stemming from increasing labor seniority and aging fleets. Recently, the emergence of ultra-low cost carriers has intensified the competition, as these newer airlines operate at extremely low costs and offer rock bottom low fares. The main objective of this thesis is to examine the evolution of U.S. airlines' productivity and cost performance from 2004 to 2012. This thesis provides an in-depth analysis of unit costs, aircraft and employee productivity of 10 major U.S. passenger airlines, which are classified into three groups: network legacy carriers (NLCs), low cost carriers (LCCs), and ultra-low cost carriers (ULCCs). We compare the unit costs and productivity trends at industry aggregate and domestic operations level for these three groups. We also explore the underlying forces that drove these trends and the effect of stage length on unit cost and productivity. The results indicate that the gaps between NLCs' and LCCs' unit cost excluding transport related and fuel expenses, labor unit cost, and employee and wage productivity have decreased from 2004 to 2012. Most notably, the gaps between their unit cost excluding fuel and transport related expenses and labor unit costs were reduced by 48% and 67%, respectively. NLCs performed dramatic cuts in labor in the 2000s and increased aircraft and employee productivity by shifting their focus to international markets. LCCs had the steepest increase in unit cost and maintained the highest aircraft utilization but are losing their traditional labor cost and productivity advantage to ULCCs. In 2012, ULCCs' labor unit cost was about half of NLCs' and LCCs', and their employee productivity was 34% greater than NLCs' and 20% greater than LCCs'. ULCCs have truly achieved lowest unit cost with highest labor efficiency in the industry.
Description
Thesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2014.
 
Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
 
Includes bibliographical references (pages 126-129).
 
Date issued
2014
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/90671
Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Keywords
Aeronautics and Astronautics.

Collections
  • Graduate Theses

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.