Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBradley Morrison and Bruce Cameron.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMarsh, John Andrew, S.M. Massachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.otherLeaders for Global Operations Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-08T15:27:08Z
dc.date.available2014-10-08T15:27:08Z
dc.date.copyright2014en_US
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/90755
dc.descriptionThesis: M.B.A., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2014. In conjunction with the Leaders for Global Operations Program at MIT.en_US
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2014. In conjunction with the Leaders for Global Operations Program at MIT.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (page 51).en_US
dc.description.abstractAircraft are complex machines consisting of tens of thousands of parts and assemblies. Due to special engineering requirements, processes, and materials, the lead time for many of the parts can be several months resulting in a long aircraft lead time. During periods of high demand long aircraft lead time is less of a concern since manufacturers often have a large backlog, which is greater than the lead time, allowing them to build the aircraft to order. However, during periods of low demand, manufacturers may need to forecast demand and make the decision to start building aircraft before having a committed customer order. The longer the lead time of the aircraft, the further out into the future the manufacturer has to forecast, which leads to greater uncertainty and variability. In this environment it becomes essential to focus on lead time reduction to allow for better forecasting. Shorter aircraft lead times also have the added benefits of increasing flexibility in production and capacity planning, and lowering inventory holding costs and work in process. Reducing aircraft lead time can often be a difficult task. However, a structured approach to lead time reduction can be very powerful. This paper presents a framework for lead time reduction that is composed of a lead time reduction chart, which provides the correct areas of focus; a strategy flowchart, which identifies the components, strategies, and actions that can be implemented to reduce aircraft lead time; and a summary of reduction strategies that are focused on low rate, complex parts. While the framework is detailed toward aircraft lead time reduction, it is general enough to apply to most supply chain and manufacturing situations. This framework was used during a six month aircraft lead time reduction study at Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, and analysis reveals that this structured approach was effective at reducing average aircraft lead time by 12.7%.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby John Andrew Marsh.en_US
dc.format.extent52 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.subjectMechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.subjectLeaders for Global Operations Program.en_US
dc.titleFramework and strategies for reducing aircraft lead timeen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.B.A.en_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentLeaders for Global Operations Program at MITen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.identifier.oclc891370270en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record