Spatial Heterogeneity in the Perception of Face and Form Attributes
Author(s)
Afraz, Arash; Pashkam, Maryam Vaziri; Cavanagh, Patrick
DownloadAfraz-2010-Spatial Heterogeneit.pdf (473.2Kb)
PUBLISHER_POLICY
Publisher Policy
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The identity of an object is a fixed property, independent of where it appears, and an effective visual system should capture this invariance [1, 2 and 3]. However, we now report that the perceived gender of a face is strongly biased toward male or female at different locations in the visual field. The spatial pattern of these biases was distinctive and stable for each individual. Identical neutral faces looked different when they were presented simultaneously at locations maximally biased to opposite genders. A similar effect was observed for perceived age of faces. We measured the magnitude of this perceptual heterogeneity for four other visual judgments: perceived aspect ratio, orientation discrimination, spatial-frequency discrimination, and color discrimination. The effect was sizeable for the aspect ratio task but substantially smaller for the other three tasks. We also evaluated perceptual heterogeneity for facial gender and orientation tasks at different spatial scales. Strong heterogeneity was observed even for the orientation task when tested at small scales. We suggest that perceptual heterogeneity is a general property of visual perception and results from undersampling of the visual signal at spatial scales that are small relative to the size of the receptive fields associated with each visual attribute.
Date issued
2010-11Department
McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MITJournal
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier
Citation
Afraz, Arash, Maryam Vaziri Pashkam, and Patrick Cavanagh. “Spatial Heterogeneity in the Perception of Face and Form Attributes.” Current Biology 20, no. 23 (December 2010): 2112–2116. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd.
Version: Final published version
ISSN
09609822
1879-0445