Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDavid R. Wallace.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLiggett, Melinda L. (Melinda Lois)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-08T18:02:50Z
dc.date.available2015-04-08T18:02:50Z
dc.date.copyright2014en_US
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96462
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2014.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 36-37).en_US
dc.description.abstractTechnology Readiness Levels are used in industry to help allocate resources, plan research and development, and clarify communication. Research Maturity Levels, proposed by Ming Leong in 2011, are designed to bring these same benefits to the academic research community. At its inception, the RML framework was accessible by a paper survey, and administrators of the survey could provide a visualization of research progress to respondents of the survey. In order to develop the survey as a helpful tool, the RML Framework was developed into an online tool. This enabled automatic visualizations and greater access to the framework. Discussed in this paper are the design of and findings from the online tool for the RML Framework. For the tool to be useful, it must reflect the process of academic research, and the output from it can help researchers plan and communicate their work. Therefore, improvement of the tool falls into two broad categories: refinement of input (researchers translating their work to the tool), and refinement of output (researchers understanding that the tool says about their work). Interviews with researchers using the tool has lead to refinements including fewer difficulty levels for maturity levels, and inputting research impediments in comparison to one another instead of on absolute scales. Asking researchers about how and with whom they would disseminate tool data has led to proposed visualizations including long term research "shape" and short term comparisons between levels of progress. The next steps in developing the Research Maturity Levels framework are implementing these changes and additions, monitoring how the tool is used, and interviewing researchers who use the tool for further improvements.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Melinda L. Liggett.en_US
dc.format.extent68 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectMechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.titleResearch maturity levels : implementation and refinement of an online tool for characterizing the progression of researchen_US
dc.title.alternativeImplementation and refinement of an online tool for characterizing the progression of researchen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc905973655en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record