Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAnsolabehere, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorReeves, Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-14T17:05:43Z
dc.date.available2015-04-14T17:05:43Z
dc.date.issued2004-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96548
dc.description.abstractThe 2000 presidential election exposed a surprisingly high level of inaccuracy in the tabulation of ballots. Differences between total vallots cast and votes counted were as high as 19 percent in some counties in Florida, and these discrepancies were widely attributed to the ballot formats, the handling of ballots, and machine operations. For those involved in the administration of elections the recount was particularly troubling. Over the last 40 years the United States has introduced new technologies, especially punch card and optically scanned ballots, to improve vote tabulations. The problems revealed in Florida suggested that these newer technologies may not in fact represent an improvement over traditional hand-counted paper ballots.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCarnegie Corporation of New York; John S. and James L. Knight Foundationen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCaltech/MIT Voting Technology Projecten_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVTP Working Paper Series;11
dc.subjectVoting tabulation accuracyen_US
dc.subjectElection recounten_US
dc.subjectNew Hampshire electionsen_US
dc.subjectHand vote counten_US
dc.subjectMachine vote counten_US
dc.titleUsing Recounts to Measure the Accuracy of Vote Tabulations: Evidence from New Hampshire Elections 1946-2002en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record