The MIT Libraries is completing a major upgrade to DSpace@MIT. Starting May 5 2026, DSpace will remain functional, viewable, searchable, and downloadable, however, you will not be able to edit existing collections or add new material. We are aiming to have full functionality restored by May 18, 2026 but intermittent service interruptions may occur. Please email dspace-lib@mit.edu
with any questions. Thank you for your patience as we implement this important upgrade.
Research Note on Footnote 24 of the 6th Circuit Hunter Decision
| dc.contributor.author | Stewart III, Charles H. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-04-16T13:07:40Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-04-16T13:07:40Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011-02-03 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96631 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The decision issued by the three-judge panel of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in the matter of Hunter v. Hamilton County Board of Elections contains a very interesting analysis of problems with Ohio’s law about counting provisional ballots when they are cast in “the right church, wrong pew” (RCWP). | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | VTP Working Paper Series;101 | |
| dc.title | Research Note on Footnote 24 of the 6th Circuit Hunter Decision | en_US |
| dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
