| dc.contributor.author | Stewart III, Charles H. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-04-16T13:07:40Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-04-16T13:07:40Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011-02-03 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96631 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The decision issued by the three-judge panel of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in the matter of Hunter v. Hamilton County Board of Elections contains a very interesting analysis of problems with Ohio’s law about counting provisional ballots when they are cast in “the right church, wrong pew” (RCWP). | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | VTP Working Paper Series;101 | |
| dc.title | Research Note on Footnote 24 of the 6th Circuit Hunter Decision | en_US |
| dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
