Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorCaroline A. Jones and Brandon Clifford.en_US
dc.contributor.authorStevermer, Tyler Jonen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-10T18:42:14Z
dc.date.available2015-06-10T18:42:14Z
dc.date.copyright2015en_US
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/97274
dc.descriptionThesis: M. Arch., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Architecture, 2015.en_US
dc.descriptionThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 126-129).en_US
dc.description.abstractFor users to become posthuman the architectural environment must become a training apparatus, a type of propaedeutic, where our built developments simultaneously develop us. This project fashions waste, ingestion, lounging, and bathing environments as components of our posthuman training grounds. Theorists in the humanities and technology sciences envisioned this next stage in our development as becoming a type of cybernetic organism-a cyborg-in which physical and intelligence-based modifications are co-produced with machines. The recent near-ubiquity of personal internet devices and oncoming wearable technologies bring the posthuman closer, and less like science-fiction. Yet despite our advanced technology, our bodies remain legitimate. Spaces remain legitimate. Within posthumanism, singularity does not occur-we do not transcend our anatomy into some type of digital non-space. As posthumans we will use our environment and our bodies as medium, mediator, and modifier to filter, flavor, and fashion our information. Boundaries blur, consciousness becomes augmented, and architecture and the body act as symbiotic prosthetics not only for each other, but socially and ecologically. Here is a land where telepresence meshes with corporeality-where the digital is also sensorial. Automation and autonomy are no longer antonyms-and our sentience is allowed to flicker between the various realities to which it is tethered. Here, architecture serves as the suture between our digital and physical lives, creating a truly networked body from the scale of the global to the microbial. Buildings can no longer be the wire mothers of Harry F. Harlow's psychological experiments on attachment. Rather than attempting to chill occupants into humanist superiority, architecture must become the cloth mother, which we posthumans nuzzle, in order to truly connect.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Tyler Jon Stevermer.en_US
dc.format.extent130 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectArchitecture.en_US
dc.titlePreposthuman : an architectural propaedeutic for the digitally-enhanceden_US
dc.title.alternativeArchitectural propaedeutic for the digitally-enhanceden_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM. Arch.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture
dc.identifier.oclc910720754en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record