Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWilliam O'Brien Jr.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTing, Evelyn (Evelyn Huei Chung)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture.en_US
dc.coverage.spatialn-us-nyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-10T18:42:29Z
dc.date.available2015-06-10T18:42:29Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/97276
dc.descriptionThesis: M. Arch., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Architecture, February 2015.en_US
dc.descriptionThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis. "February 2015."en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 88-89).en_US
dc.description.abstractGiven the renewed status of the object in contemporary architectural discourse, this thesis explores the object's potential to participate in urban-scale field conditions despite its singularity and perceived autonomy from surrounding context. It proposes a strategy of object-making that privileges two faces as a means to highlight the parallel opposition that exists between the perimeter and core of a typical city block, and the binary conditions that occur as a result of this divide. The emphasis on two faces also creates the effect of flatness, challenging the three-dimensional quality of objects by defining them with twodimensional figures. The scenario of an expanding urban university campus, specifically the expansion of New York University in lower Manhattan, is used as the case study. The thesis accepts the theory that the knowledge economy has replaced industry in driving the socioeconomic and urban development of 21st-century cities, and that universities, a key player, must grow to stay competitive. The academic campus often functions like a city in microcosm, requiring its own services and infrastructure, and having to balance individual identity with a collective sense of place. At the same time, its growth inevitably conflicts with the communities that occupy the property in question. The two-faced formal device seeks to call out this simultaneous parallel and opposition, and argues for the object's potential to participate both in semiotics and abstract field conditions.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Evelyn Ting.en_US
dc.format.extent90 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectArchitecture.en_US
dc.titlePlain objectsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM. Arch.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture
dc.identifier.oclc910722569en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record