Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-Gomez, Vicente
dc.contributor.authorGenel, Shy
dc.contributor.authorVogelsberger, Mark
dc.contributor.authorSijacki, Debora
dc.contributor.authorPillepich, Annalisa
dc.contributor.authorSales, Laura V.
dc.contributor.authorTorrey, Paul
dc.contributor.authorSnyder, Greg
dc.contributor.authorNelson, Dylan
dc.contributor.authorSpringel, Volker
dc.contributor.authorMa, Chung-Pei
dc.contributor.authorHernquist, Lars
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-11T12:23:53Z
dc.date.available2015-09-11T12:23:53Z
dc.date.issued2015-03
dc.date.submitted2015-02
dc.identifier.issn0035-8711
dc.identifier.issn1365-2966
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/98454
dc.description.abstractWe have constructed merger trees for galaxies in the Illustris simulation by directly tracking the baryonic content of subhaloes. These merger trees are used to calculate the galaxy–galaxy merger rate as a function of descendant stellar mass, progenitor stellar mass ratio, and redshift. We demonstrate that the most appropriate definition for the mass ratio of a galaxy–galaxy merger consists in taking both progenitor masses at the time when the secondary progenitor reaches its maximum stellar mass. Additionally, we avoid effects from ‘orphaned’ galaxies by allowing some objects to ‘skip’ a snapshot when finding a descendant, and by only considering mergers which show a well-defined ‘infall’ moment. Adopting these definitions, we obtain well-converged predictions for the galaxy–galaxy merger rate with the following main features, which are qualitatively similar to the halo–halo merger rate except for the last one: a strong correlation with redshift that evolves as ~(1 + z)[superscript 2.4–2.8], a power law with respect to mass ratio, and an increasing dependence on descendant stellar mass, which steepens significantly for descendant stellar masses greater than ~2 × 10[superscript 11] M[subscript ⊙]. These trends are consistent with observational constraints for medium-sized galaxies (M[subscript *] ≳ 10[superscript 10] M[subscript ⊙]), but in tension with some recent observations of the close pair fraction for massive galaxies (M[subscript *] ≳ 10[superscript 11] M[subscript ⊙]), which report a nearly constant or decreasing evolution with redshift. Finally, we provide a fitting function for the galaxy–galaxy merger rate which is accurate over a wide range of stellar masses, progenitor mass ratios, and redshifts.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv264en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcearXiven_US
dc.titleThe merger rate of galaxies in the Illustris simulation: a comparison with observations and semi-empirical modelsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationRodriguez-Gomez, V., S. Genel, M. Vogelsberger, D. Sijacki, A. Pillepich, L. V. Sales, P. Torrey, et al. “The Merger Rate of Galaxies in the Illustris Simulation: a Comparison with Observations and Semi-Empirical Models.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 449, no. 1 (March 14, 2015): 49–64.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physicsen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorVogelsberger, Marken_US
dc.relation.journalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societyen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsRodriguez-Gomez, V.; Genel, S.; Vogelsberger, M.; Sijacki, D.; Pillepich, A.; Sales, L. V.; Torrey, P.; Snyder, G.; Nelson, D.; Springel, V.; Ma, C.-P.; Hernquist, L.en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8593-7692
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record