Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBarbara Hughey.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDe Armas, Ricardo Eduardoen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-29T18:08:52Z
dc.date.available2015-09-29T18:08:52Z
dc.date.copyright2015en_US
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/98920
dc.descriptionThesis: S.B., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2015.en_US
dc.descriptionThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 39-41).en_US
dc.description.abstractOne of the most common treatments for men with localized prostate cancer is radiation therapy, which involves delivering small doses of radiation to the prostate for an extended period of time. Stereotactic-body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a form of radiotherapy that delivers increased dosage to the prostate with more precision. The results are shorter treatment times, increased effectiveness, and less toxicity to surrounding tissue. However, the prostate has been found to move around during treatment (intrafraction) and between treatments (interfraction). With greater precision, there is a greater risk of missing the target while the prostate is moving. This study assesses the impact of intrafractional prostate motion on the accuracy and efficiency of SBRT on CyberKnife. Prostate tracking log files were acquired from 6 patients with prostate cancer, which comprises18 SBRT fractions and 1,892 X-ray image registrations. Each image contains real-time prostate motion in 6D. The data were compared against clinically used margins to identify periods of large prostate motion during treatment. Results indicate significant periods of prostate motion, with the greatest movement occurring in anterior-posterior translation (6.2% outside margin) and pitch rotation (4.3% outside margin). The percentage of prostate motion beyond margins varied among patients, with an average of 12.8% outside clinical margins and 36.0% outside hypothetically reduced margins. The treatment time for each fraction was also recorded to quantify the efficiency of CyberKnife delivery. Because of motion-related delays, optimal setup of 5-15 minutes was seen in only 50% of the fractions, and optimal beam delivery times of 30-40 minutes in 44% of fractions. Thus, results suggest that treatment accuracy and efficiency were negatively affected by the occurrence of large prostate motion. Techniques that immobilize the prostate during treatment may be considered to reduce intrafractional prostate motion and ensure greater accuracy and efficiency of prostate cancer SBRT.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Ricardo Eduardo De Armas.en_US
dc.format.extent44 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectMechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.titleImpact of intrafractional prostate motion on the accuracy and efficiency of prostate cancer treatment on CyberKnife radiotherapyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.B.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc921147777en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record