Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJ. Christopher Love and Retsef Levi.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKress, Daniel Evanen_US
dc.contributor.otherLeaders for Global Operations Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-29T18:59:13Z
dc.date.available2015-09-29T18:59:13Z
dc.date.copyright2015en_US
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/99031
dc.descriptionThesis: M.B.A., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2015. In conjunction with the Leaders for Global Operations Program at MIT.en_US
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, 2015. In conjunction with the Leaders for Global Operations Program at MIT.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 61-62).en_US
dc.description.abstractA critical cost driver in the product development process is the manufacturing of clinical trial material supplies. The clinical manufacturing process operates under similar regulatory burdens as commercial biopharmaceutical manufacturing, but must operate with a high degree of flexibility to respond to emerging data from ongoing clinical programs and competitive intelligence. This project investigates the current state of clinical monoclonal antibody (mAb) manufacturing and generates possible future states for low-cost, flexible manufacturing. Pfizer currently has a world-class clinical manufacturing facility in St. Louis, MO, and forecasts have not predicted sufficient growth in the market to justify additional facilities under the current strategy. However, with many other companies turning to single-use technology, Pfizer would like to consider the benefits of a new low-cost, flexible facility for the benefits of flexibility and faster speed to market. A high-level facility model includes capital costs, technical specifications, and a dynamic view of the operational costs based on product attributes. This model shows that a campaign cost of less than $2.6M can be achieved with only 3 projects per year, which represents a facility utilization of less than 40%. At a loading of 4 campaigns per year, this facility would have a payback period of less than 3 years. The conservative facility design shows how capacity can be added with a low operational cost and less than $5M of overhead per year. Business factors such as pipeline prospects and availability of capital may prevent execution of the project in the near term, but investment in single-use equipment is advisable to gain experience in technologies that are likely to play a large part in biopharmaceutical manufacturing in the future.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Daniel Evan Kress.en_US
dc.format.extent62 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.subjectChemical Engineering.en_US
dc.subjectLeaders for Global Operations Program.en_US
dc.titleModeling and economic evaluation of early stage clinical monoclonal antibody manufacturing using single use technologyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.B.A.en_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentLeaders for Global Operations Program at MITen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.identifier.oclc921307305en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record