Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMichael A. Cusumano.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVardhan, Harsh, S.M. Massachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.otherSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-30T13:58:51Z
dc.date.available2015-09-30T13:58:51Z
dc.date.copyright2015en_US
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/99112
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M. in Management Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2015.en_US
dc.descriptionThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 61-72).en_US
dc.description.abstractMost internet business models today are positioned as platforms that connect two or more groups of users. From online social networking to electronic retail, we find that multi-sided platforms are penetrating consumers' lives more deeply with time. There has been significant amount of research around what it takes to establish a successful platform and the strategies to compete in a platform market. However, there is a significant research gap in a systematic analysis of the spectacular failures that platform markets have witnessed over the last couple of decades. This paper studies these failures and derives lessons from them, in order to add a unique and much needed perspective to the various platform success stories. After conducting a comprehensive literature review to determine the various factors that are critical in determining a platform's success, this paper defines a systems model to analyze platforms. This model is then used as a base for analyzing failed platforms, picked from three different software niches - Online Social Networks, Question & Answer Platforms and Instant Messengers. The analysis of each platform concludes with isolated primary points of failure. It is found that the root causes behind platform failure vary across market niches and timelines. For instance, the failure of an online social network in the early 90s (Myspace) is found to be different from the failure of such a platform today (Google Plus). A recurring theme across the analyzed failures was the need to focus on Design and User Experience, which has been identified as a new axis of differentiation in platform markets. User experience is found to evolve over time with changing consumer expectations. This underscores the need for platforms to keep in sync with evolving consumer needs. This, in turn, implies that platforms need to be agile to respond quickly to market shifts and should look to leverage community innovation by opening the platform. Lastly, envelopment has been identified as a potent strategy to compete in platform markets and to trounce well-ensconced competitors.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Harsh Vardhan.en_US
dc.format.extent72 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.titlePlatform failures : lessons for strategic managementen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M. in Management Researchen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.identifier.oclc921180851en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record