<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-20T13:10:59Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/100112" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/100112</identifier><datestamp>2026-06-06T01:04:51Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131024</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Jacopo Buongiorno, Paul Sclavounos and Pat Hale.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Strother, Matthew Brian</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2015-12-03T20:54:09Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2015-12-03T20:54:09Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2015</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2015</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/100112</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">929473303</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis: Nav. E., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2015.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis: S.M. in Engineering and Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, 2015.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (pages 85-86).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">Hydrodynamic analysis of two models of the Offshore Floating Nuclear Plant [91 was conducted. The OFNP-300 and the OFNP-1100 were both exposed to computer simulated sea states in the computer program OrcaFlex: first to sets of monochromatic waves, each consisting of a single frequency and waveheight, and then to Bretschneider and JONSWAP spectra simulating 100-year storms in, respectively, the Gulf of Mexico and the North Sea. Hydrodynamic coefficients for these simulations were obtained using a separate computer program, WAMIT. Both models exhibited satisfactory performance in both heave and pitch. An alternative design of the OFNP-300 was developed and similarly analyzed in attempt to further improve hydrodynamic performance. A catenary mooring system was designed and analyzed for both plant models. The number of chains and the length of each were selected to ensure the mooring systems would withstand, with sufficient margins of safety, the maximum tension produced in a 100-year storm. This analysis was conducted both with all the designed mooring lines intact, and with the worst-case line broken. A lifecycle cost analysis of various mooring systems was conducted in order to minimize the cost of the mooring system while maintaining adequate performance.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Matthew Brian Strother.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">Nav.E.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.M. in Engineering and Management</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">86 pages</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Mechanical Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Engineering Systems Division.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Hydrodynamic analysis of the offshore floating nuclear power plant</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="e95072fb-eeb9-4d0c-ae0b-5d352b87ab3a">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Hydrodynamic analysis of the offshore floating nuclear power plant&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2015&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Strother, Matthew Brian&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Mechanical Engineering.&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>Engineering Systems Division.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>Hydrodynamic analysis of two models of the Offshore Floating Nuclear Plant [91 was conducted. The OFNP-300 and the OFNP-1100 were both exposed to computer simulated sea states in the computer program OrcaFlex: first to sets of monochromatic waves, each consisting of a single frequency and waveheight, and then to Bretschneider and JONSWAP spectra simulating 100-year storms in, respectively, the Gulf of Mexico and the North Sea. Hydrodynamic coefficients for these simulations were obtained using a separate computer program, WAMIT. Both models exhibited satisfactory performance in both heave and pitch. An alternative design of the OFNP-300 was developed and similarly analyzed in attempt to further improve hydrodynamic performance. A catenary mooring system was designed and analyzed for both plant models. The number of chains and the length of each were selected to ensure the mooring systems would withstand, with sufficient margins of safety, the maximum tension produced in a 100-year storm. This analysis was conducted both with all the designed mooring lines intact, and with the worst-case line broken. A lifecycle cost analysis of various mooring systems was conducted in order to minimize the cost of the mooring system while maintaining adequate performance.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>