<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T01:14:01Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/100313" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/100313</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:54:46Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Michael Cusumano.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Wong, Ken Chi Ho</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">System Design and Management Program.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department" lang="en_US">System Design and Management Program.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2015-12-16T15:55:04Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2015-12-16T15:55:04Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2015</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2015</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/100313</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">932127325</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis: S.M. in Engineering and Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, System Design and Management Program, 2015.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">This electronic version was submitted by the student author.  The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (pages 125-134).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">Industry platforms in the software sector are increasingly being developed in open source. Firms seeking to position themselves as platform leaders with such technologies must find ways of operating within the unique constraints of open source development. This thesis aims to understand those challenges by analyzing the Android and Hadoop ecosystems through an augmented version of Porter's Five Forces framework proposed by Intel's Andrew Grove. The analysis finds that platform contenders in open source behave differently depending on whether they focus on competing against alternative platforms or alternative providers of the same platform as rivals. This focus informs key decisions that the firm takes, including how it interacts with complementors and its approach to innovation. Due to the fact that open source vendors tend to lack unilateral authority over technology decisions, they can only seek to influence the behavior of the ecosystem by securing key relationships in the value network. In particular, they must secure the right engineering talent, access to key complements and superior paths to the customer. The research highlights some of the factors and tactics platform contenders in Hadoop and Android considered in acquiring these relationships. The open nature of FOSS (Free and Open Source Software) also allow new technologies to emerge and change the definition of the platform's boundaries. This creates a further strategic challenge for open source platform contenders. Keywords: platform strategy, platform leadership, open source software, Hadoop, Android.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Ken Chi Ho Wong.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.M. in Engineering and Management</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">viii, 134 pages</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Engineering Systems Division.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">System Design and Management Program.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Platform leadership in open source software</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="af4ac4e5-5579-462d-9243-dc68ff966637">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Platform leadership in open source software&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2015&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Wong, Ken Chi Ho&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Engineering Systems Division.&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>System Design and Management Program.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>Industry platforms in the software sector are increasingly being developed in open source. Firms seeking to position themselves as platform leaders with such technologies must find ways of operating within the unique constraints of open source development. This thesis aims to understand those challenges by analyzing the Android and Hadoop ecosystems through an augmented version of Porter&amp;apos;s Five Forces framework proposed by Intel&amp;apos;s Andrew Grove. The analysis finds that platform contenders in open source behave differently depending on whether they focus on competing against alternative platforms or alternative providers of the same platform as rivals. This focus informs key decisions that the firm takes, including how it interacts with complementors and its approach to innovation. Due to the fact that open source vendors tend to lack unilateral authority over technology decisions, they can only seek to influence the behavior of the ecosystem by securing key relationships in the value network. In particular, they must secure the right engineering talent, access to key complements and superior paths to the customer. The research highlights some of the factors and tactics platform contenders in Hadoop and Android considered in acquiring these relationships. The open nature of FOSS (Free and Open Source Software) also allow new technologies to emerge and change the definition of the platform&amp;apos;s boundaries. This creates a further strategic challenge for open source platform contenders. Keywords: platform strategy, platform leadership, open source software, Hadoop, Android.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>