<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T00:54:27Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/103449" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/103449</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:53:53Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Hamsa Balakrishnan.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">McFarlane, Patrick Kough</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2016-07-01T18:41:23Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2016-07-01T18:41:23Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2016</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2016</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103449</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">952112150</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (pages 111-112).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">This thesis analyzes the effects of two algorithms that control the departure of aircraft at congested airports, with an emphasis on the uncertainty of the underlying processes. These algorithms, N-control and dynamic programming, belong to a broader class of control policies called Pushback Rate Control (PRC) policies that calculate a pushback rate for departing aircraft based on the state of the airport surface congestion. During times of congestion, these algorithms limit the amount of aircraft on the airport surface while maintaining departure throughput. This reduces the taxi-out time of aircraft, resulting in reduced fuel burn and emissions. This thesis introduces the policies and simulates their performance at LaGuardia Airport while varying two policy parameters, the length of the prediction interval and the number of prediction intervals, under several types of uncertainty, including the departure schedule and arrival rate. As will be shown, each policy results in significant taxi-out time reductions, saving airlines at least 60,000 minutes of taxiing over a 2-month period with the traditional 15-minute time window simulations. However, when accounting for the uncertainty in the algorithm inputs or the variation of policy parameters, the performance of both PRC policies degrades. By accounting for the variation of policy parameters and the different sources of uncertainty that affect airport surface management, the main contribution of this thesis provides a realistic analysis of PRC policies.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Patrick Kough McFarlane.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.M.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">112 pages</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Aeronautics and Astronautics.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Analysis and uncertainty of airport pushback rate control policies</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="0747dc50-091e-4936-8b36-4857c5be4f05">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Analysis and uncertainty of airport pushback rate control policies&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2016&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>McFarlane, Patrick Kough&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Aeronautics and Astronautics.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>This thesis analyzes the effects of two algorithms that control the departure of aircraft at congested airports, with an emphasis on the uncertainty of the underlying processes. These algorithms, N-control and dynamic programming, belong to a broader class of control policies called Pushback Rate Control (PRC) policies that calculate a pushback rate for departing aircraft based on the state of the airport surface congestion. During times of congestion, these algorithms limit the amount of aircraft on the airport surface while maintaining departure throughput. This reduces the taxi-out time of aircraft, resulting in reduced fuel burn and emissions. This thesis introduces the policies and simulates their performance at LaGuardia Airport while varying two policy parameters, the length of the prediction interval and the number of prediction intervals, under several types of uncertainty, including the departure schedule and arrival rate. As will be shown, each policy results in significant taxi-out time reductions, saving airlines at least 60,000 minutes of taxiing over a 2-month period with the traditional 15-minute time window simulations. However, when accounting for the uncertainty in the algorithm inputs or the variation of policy parameters, the performance of both PRC policies degrades. By accounting for the variation of policy parameters and the different sources of uncertainty that affect airport surface management, the main contribution of this thesis provides a realistic analysis of PRC policies.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>