<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T15:50:06Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/104204" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/104204</identifier><datestamp>2026-06-17T14:46:48Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131022</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Richard D. Braatz.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Foguth, Lucas Charles</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2016-09-13T19:12:06Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2016-09-13T19:12:06Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2016</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2016</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/104204</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">958138129</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, 2016.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (pages 121-126).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">In the pharmaceutical industry there has recently been much interest in design spaces: sets of critical process parameters (CPPs) which guarantee that critical quality attributes (CQAs) of a manufacturing process are within specifications. For continuous pharmaceutical processes, design spaces are usually calculated by assuming steady state operation and approximating the mapping between CPPs and CQAs using a Taylor series. The full design space can then be calculated using a plantwide approach or a unit-by-unit approach. Common inner approximations of the design space (e.g. hyper-rectangles) can result in significant conservatism, especially when a unit-by-unit approach is employed. Because control loops tend to have a linearizing effect on processes, design spaces for closed-loop processes can often be calculated using low-order Taylor series approximations, resulting in simpler expressions for the full design space (e.g. polytopes). Control loops also tend to enlarge design spaces, sometimes by more than an order of magnitude. Unfortunately, disturbances, noise, and uncertainties will prevent real processes from ever reaching "steady state". Therefore, design spaces calculated at steady state cannot be used to guarantee quality specifications. In fact, because design spaces fail to take into account any process dynamics, constraining a controller to work within a design space may result in failure to meet quality specifications, significant degradation of controller performance, and input jitter. As a substitute for design space, robust model predictive control (RMPC) is a promising technology for dynamically guaranteeing constraint satisfaction on process outputs. Although many RMPC algorithms have been proposed in the literature, the computational cost of these algorithms tends to be a strong function of the state vector size. This is problematic for continuous pharmaceutical processes, which are typically high- or infinite-dimensional. However, input-output models (e.g. finite step response models) can integrated with traditional RMPC strategies to robustly control high-dimensional systems. Although RMPC can be used to counteract the presence of disturbances, uncertainty, and measurement noise, faults also present a threat to quality constraint satisfaction of continuous pharmaceutical processes. Active fault diagnosis of hybrid systems is particularly difficult due to the explosion of mode combinations with prediction horizon. Fortunately, the set of input sequences which do not guarantee diagnosis can be outer bounded offline as a function of a parameterized initial condition set. This enables an algorithm for guaranteed active fault diagnosis of hybrid systems which can be implemented quickly online.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Lucas Charles Foguth.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">Ph.D.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">126 pages</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Chemical Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Integration of quality-by-design into control systems design for continuous pharmaceutical manufacturing</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="c7416de8-4a85-4241-91cd-0b02c168d37d">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Integration of quality-by-design into control systems design for continuous pharmaceutical manufacturing&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2016&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Foguth, Lucas Charles&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Chemical Engineering.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>In the pharmaceutical industry there has recently been much interest in design spaces: sets of critical process parameters (CPPs) which guarantee that critical quality attributes (CQAs) of a manufacturing process are within specifications. For continuous pharmaceutical processes, design spaces are usually calculated by assuming steady state operation and approximating the mapping between CPPs and CQAs using a Taylor series. The full design space can then be calculated using a plantwide approach or a unit-by-unit approach. Common inner approximations of the design space (e.g. hyper-rectangles) can result in significant conservatism, especially when a unit-by-unit approach is employed. Because control loops tend to have a linearizing effect on processes, design spaces for closed-loop processes can often be calculated using low-order Taylor series approximations, resulting in simpler expressions for the full design space (e.g. polytopes). Control loops also tend to enlarge design spaces, sometimes by more than an order of magnitude. Unfortunately, disturbances, noise, and uncertainties will prevent real processes from ever reaching &amp;quot;steady state&amp;quot;. Therefore, design spaces calculated at steady state cannot be used to guarantee quality specifications. In fact, because design spaces fail to take into account any process dynamics, constraining a controller to work within a design space may result in failure to meet quality specifications, significant degradation of controller performance, and input jitter. As a substitute for design space, robust model predictive control (RMPC) is a promising technology for dynamically guaranteeing constraint satisfaction on process outputs. Although many RMPC algorithms have been proposed in the literature, the computational cost of these algorithms tends to be a strong function of the state vector size. This is problematic for continuous pharmaceutical processes, which are typically high- or infinite-dimensional. However, input-output models (e.g. finite step response models) can integrated with traditional RMPC strategies to robustly control high-dimensional systems. Although RMPC can be used to counteract the presence of disturbances, uncertainty, and measurement noise, faults also present a threat to quality constraint satisfaction of continuous pharmaceutical processes. Active fault diagnosis of hybrid systems is particularly difficult due to the explosion of mode combinations with prediction horizon. Fortunately, the set of input sequences which do not guarantee diagnosis can be outer bounded offline as a function of a parameterized initial condition set. This enables an algorithm for guaranteed active fault diagnosis of hybrid systems which can be implemented quickly online.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>