<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-18T20:36:45Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/104217" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/104217</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-28T17:48:32Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Kerri Cahoy and Don Rosenfield.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Gantner, Karl (Karl Andrew)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Leaders for Global Operations Program.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department" lang="en_US">Leaders for Global Operations Program at MIT</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Sloan School of Management</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2016-09-13T19:13:38Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2016-09-13T19:13:38Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2016</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2016</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/104217</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">958140964</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis: M.B.A., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2016. In conjunction with the Leaders for Global Operations Program at MIT.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (pages 50-52).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">Reducing cycle time for geostationary communication satellites represents a major competitive advantage for manufacturers. Reducing cycle time can be done through application of lean manufacturing techniques such as production leveling, or heijunka. However, research on applying lean manufacturing to the manufacture of satellites is not straightforward as payloads vary considerably. To show the effect of production leveling on satellite manufacturing, we analyze production data recorded over a 5-year time frame from a major satellite manufacturer to propose and simulate a method for leveling production. Statistical analysis of historical cycle times was performed to identify the critical path and bottleneck in the satellite development process. Production through the bottleneck was then leveled at the maximum consistent throughput. The effect of leveling was estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation to predict the total cycle time and delivery date for each satellite. Analysis showed that the critical path ran through the development of the communications payload and the bottleneck was at the payload unit build process. The bottleneck was leveled to operate at a takt time of 2 months with 4 payloads in WIP at a time. Simulating a leveled bottleneck estimated that the total cycle time of each satellite, on average, would decrease by 1.9 months with a standard deviation of 14 days. Cycle time in the payload unit manufacturing process fell from 13 months to 8 months, with standard deviations 64 and 12 days, respectively. Over the 5-year period investigated, all satellites through the factory would have met their delivery dates while being produced to a 2 month takt. These results demonstrate that production leveling can be applied to the high-mix low volume manufacturing of geostationary communications satellites to increase efficiency and reduce cycle time. Leveling manufacturing should be a top priority for all satellite manufacturers looking to become more competitive.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Karl Gantner.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.M.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">M.B.A.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">52 pages</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Aeronautics and Astronautics.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Sloan School of Management.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Leaders for Global Operations Program.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Production leveling and cycle time reduction in satellite manufacturing</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="edfd9d44-178f-4085-b49f-6048a466383a">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Production leveling and cycle time reduction in satellite manufacturing&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2016&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Gantner, Karl (Karl Andrew)&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Aeronautics and Astronautics.&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword&gt;Sloan School of Management.&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>Leaders for Global Operations Program.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>Reducing cycle time for geostationary communication satellites represents a major competitive advantage for manufacturers. Reducing cycle time can be done through application of lean manufacturing techniques such as production leveling, or heijunka. However, research on applying lean manufacturing to the manufacture of satellites is not straightforward as payloads vary considerably. To show the effect of production leveling on satellite manufacturing, we analyze production data recorded over a 5-year time frame from a major satellite manufacturer to propose and simulate a method for leveling production. Statistical analysis of historical cycle times was performed to identify the critical path and bottleneck in the satellite development process. Production through the bottleneck was then leveled at the maximum consistent throughput. The effect of leveling was estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation to predict the total cycle time and delivery date for each satellite. Analysis showed that the critical path ran through the development of the communications payload and the bottleneck was at the payload unit build process. The bottleneck was leveled to operate at a takt time of 2 months with 4 payloads in WIP at a time. Simulating a leveled bottleneck estimated that the total cycle time of each satellite, on average, would decrease by 1.9 months with a standard deviation of 14 days. Cycle time in the payload unit manufacturing process fell from 13 months to 8 months, with standard deviations 64 and 12 days, respectively. Over the 5-year period investigated, all satellites through the factory would have met their delivery dates while being produced to a 2 month takt. These results demonstrate that production leveling can be applied to the high-mix low volume manufacturing of geostationary communications satellites to increase efficiency and reduce cycle time. Leveling manufacturing should be a top priority for all satellite manufacturers looking to become more competitive.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>