<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T05:21:32Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/104533" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/104533</identifier><datestamp>2026-06-16T18:54:08Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131022</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Eric Heller and Nuh Gedik.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Schram, Matthew Christopher</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2016-09-30T19:34:16Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2016-09-30T19:34:16Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2016</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2016</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/104533</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">958299942</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Physics, 2016.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (pages 146-152).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">The conventional notion of coherent atom-surface scattering originates from the existence of Bragg peaks in elastic scattering. The helium atom acts as a quantum mechanical matter wave that is coherent with itself; the well-defined phase relationship of the particle beam at the different spatial positions at surface impact implies the possibility of different non-specular outgoing beams thanks to the constructive interference of the emitted waves from each surface atom. Moreover, we still observe diffraction peaks when scattering off a lattice at finite temperature, although the peaks are here diminished by the Debye-Waller factor. However, in the case of inelastic scattering, the surface particles are displaced by the scattering atom itself and may then emit or absorb one or more phonons to the scatterer. Acoustic phonons produced by this process are gapless excitations; hence, extremely long-wavelength phonons will contribute vanishingly small shifts in energy and momentum. The difficulty in observing this is exacerbated due to the roughly 1eV resolution of high energy helium scattering experiments. So through phonon excitation the surface has "measured" the particle's presence which acts to destroy quantum coherence, though we still observe diffraction spots which imply coherent scattering. How do we reconcile these disparate viewpoints? We propose a new way of looking at the question of coherence in atom-surface scattering. Instead of considering a single beam of helium particles, we instead use semiclassical techniques to simulate an initially coherent superposition of helium particles with equal probabilities of interacting with the surface or not interacting with the surface. We then evolve the classical mechanical trajectories, and recombine the atoms after scattering to observe the resulting interference pattern. The degree to which phonons are excited in the lattice by the scattering process dictates the fringe contrast of the interference pattern of the resulting beams. We show that for a wide range of conditions, despite the massive change in the momentum perpendicular to the surface, we can still expect to have coherent (in the superposition sense) scattering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Matthew Christopher Schram.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">Ph.D.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">152 pages</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Physics.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Semiclassical studies of decoherence produced by scattering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="36585bb5-a1af-4b37-8249-7e6445823f30">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Semiclassical studies of decoherence produced by scattering&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2016&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Schram, Matthew Christopher&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Physics.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>The conventional notion of coherent atom-surface scattering originates from the existence of Bragg peaks in elastic scattering. The helium atom acts as a quantum mechanical matter wave that is coherent with itself; the well-defined phase relationship of the particle beam at the different spatial positions at surface impact implies the possibility of different non-specular outgoing beams thanks to the constructive interference of the emitted waves from each surface atom. Moreover, we still observe diffraction peaks when scattering off a lattice at finite temperature, although the peaks are here diminished by the Debye-Waller factor. However, in the case of inelastic scattering, the surface particles are displaced by the scattering atom itself and may then emit or absorb one or more phonons to the scatterer. Acoustic phonons produced by this process are gapless excitations; hence, extremely long-wavelength phonons will contribute vanishingly small shifts in energy and momentum. The difficulty in observing this is exacerbated due to the roughly 1eV resolution of high energy helium scattering experiments. So through phonon excitation the surface has &amp;quot;measured&amp;quot; the particle&amp;apos;s presence which acts to destroy quantum coherence, though we still observe diffraction spots which imply coherent scattering. How do we reconcile these disparate viewpoints? We propose a new way of looking at the question of coherence in atom-surface scattering. Instead of considering a single beam of helium particles, we instead use semiclassical techniques to simulate an initially coherent superposition of helium particles with equal probabilities of interacting with the surface or not interacting with the surface. We then evolve the classical mechanical trajectories, and recombine the atoms after scattering to observe the resulting interference pattern. The degree to which phonons are excited in the lattice by the scattering process dictates the fringe contrast of the interference pattern of the resulting beams. We show that for a wide range of conditions, despite the massive change in the momentum perpendicular to the surface, we can still expect to have coherent (in the superposition sense) scattering.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>