2026-09-20T22:21:34Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request

oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/1113882022-01-13T07:54:09Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131023

Balakrishnan Rajagopal. Goyes, Francis Jhoan Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning s-ec--- 2017-09-15T15:31:58Z 2017-09-15T15:31:58Z 2017 2017 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/111388 1003291727 Thesis: M.C.P., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, 2017. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (pages [99]-107). This thesis explores Quito's historical development of policies for informal neighborhood legalization to analyze the relationship between the national government, municipal council and low-income neighborhoods of the City. I follow Gilbert and Ward's reasoning of regarding the State as a political entity, and its policies of land as a proxy of its relation to the most vulnerable populations (Ward 1985). I ask how constitutional and legislative arrangements were implemented through different political moments, and in what ways their implementation contributed to the successes and failures of the land legalization efforts of Quito using a pro-poor framework. I concentrate on the policies enacted by the last three Municipal administrations as well as Regula tu Barrio (Legalize your Neighborhood), the current program for legalizing informal settlements in Quito. While legalization policies have existed since the late 1980s, they were never fully operationalized due to the low capacity of the Municipality, clientelist practices and lack of continued political interest. Through a pro-poor policy analysis, I argue that following the ratification of the 2008 Constitution and other national legislation, the Municipality had a greater responsibility towards establishing a pro-poor policy towards land legalization, which resulted in an increase of legalized neighborhoods and basic infrastructure provision for previously informal settlements. I also show that while there appears to be continuity through Municipal administrations, difficulties for legalization remain, including evaluation mechanisms, overcoming obstacles of land traffickers and community organizations and creation of a comprehensive policy for land and housing. by Francis Jhoan Goyes. M.C.P. 107 pages eng Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 Urban Studies and Planning. The politics of implementation : towards a pro-poor land legalization policy in Quito Thesis application/pdf Publication unknown unknown <Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="9567bd33-fc2d-4bd6-a2af-99e2d9636b79"> <Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type> <Language>eng</Language> <Title>The politics of implementation : towards a pro-poor land legalization policy in Quito</Title> <PublishedIn> <Publication> </Publication> </PublishedIn> <PublicationDate>2017</PublicationDate> <Authors> <Author> <DisplayName>Goyes, Francis Jhoan</DisplayName> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> </Authors> <Editors> </Editors> <Publishers> <Publisher> <DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName> <OrgUnit /> </Publisher> </Publishers> <License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</License> <Keyword>Urban Studies and Planning.</Keyword> <Abstract>This thesis explores Quito&apos;s historical development of policies for informal neighborhood legalization to analyze the relationship between the national government, municipal council and low-income neighborhoods of the City. I follow Gilbert and Ward&apos;s reasoning of regarding the State as a political entity, and its policies of land as a proxy of its relation to the most vulnerable populations (Ward 1985). I ask how constitutional and legislative arrangements were implemented through different political moments, and in what ways their implementation contributed to the successes and failures of the land legalization efforts of Quito using a pro-poor framework. I concentrate on the policies enacted by the last three Municipal administrations as well as Regula tu Barrio (Legalize your Neighborhood), the current program for legalizing informal settlements in Quito. While legalization policies have existed since the late 1980s, they were never fully operationalized due to the low capacity of the Municipality, clientelist practices and lack of continued political interest. Through a pro-poor policy analysis, I argue that following the ratification of the 2008 Constitution and other national legislation, the Municipality had a greater responsibility towards establishing a pro-poor policy towards land legalization, which resulted in an increase of legalized neighborhoods and basic infrastructure provision for previously informal settlements. I also show that while there appears to be continuity through Municipal administrations, difficulties for legalization remain, including evaluation mechanisms, overcoming obstacles of land traffickers and community organizations and creation of a comprehensive policy for land and housing.</Abstract> <Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" > </Access> </Publication>